The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 20:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

World Enough and Time[edit]

Created by Miyagawa (talk). Self-nominated at 16:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC).

 • No issues found with article, ready for human review.

 • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 16:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Just to note, the copyvio problem picked up by the bot are quotes from reviewers. Miyagawa (talk) 17:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Well, I've just gone through it and reviewed it. I verify the bot's findings above. I also verify that what the Earwig tool sees as copyvio are quotes, proper names and things like "a premiere in Beverly Hills". Additional spot check with Labs Dup Detector seems OK. Checklinks shows all external links are clean. Dab solver says there are no dabs in the article. I would say it would be helpful if ALT1 said who Joss Whedon is, but you can't define him with one or two words. I got an unexpected laugh from the Controversy section. Any Wikipedian who has seen enough self published sources discounted will see a similar perspective in this section. This passes. — Maile (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)