Template:Importance inline
This page is a soft redirect.
![]() | Wikipedia:Notability does not determine relevance of article content. It only determines whether or not we will have an entire article about a topic. For an explanation of the difference, see WP:NOTREL. |
If you are attempting to flag content in an article on the basis of its importance or relevance to the subject, please use one of the templates below, as appropriate:
((Trivia))
– Suggests relocation of the relevant details in a trivia section, to another section (or article).((Trivia section))
– Same as above, but goes at the top of the trivia section, rather than the top of the article.((Off topic))
– For a section that has wandered from the topic of the article((Content))
– For an article or section containing information whose relevance is disputed.((Importance section))
– For a section with information that is simply off-topic for the article, and needs removal or relocation to another article.((Importance inline))
– For a particular item that is off-topic needs removal or relocation to another article.((Self-sourcing examples))
– For an article or section with poorly cited examples.((Better source example))
– For a particular instance of a poorly cited example.((Relevance inline))
– For a particular item that doesn't seem to belong in the context at all.((Non sequitur))
– For a namedropping of someone or something the relevance of which may not be clear to the reader.((Overly detailed))
– For excessive focus on minute details not of interest to our general readership.((Summarize section))
– For sections that are too detailed and need to be summarized.((Example farm))
– For excessive use of examples.((Too many see alsos))
– For an indiscriminate "See also" section, most of which should be pruned or integrated into the prose.((In popular culture))
– For excessive "popular culture" and "media references" sorts of material.((Fiction trivia))
(or ((In-universe))
) – For too many trivial fictional references (or too much "in-universe" detail).((Long plot))
, ((All plot))
– For excessively detailed plot summaries.((Cleanup book))
, ((Cleanup film))
– For excessive detail about particular types of works (other than plot and fictional or in-universe issues).((Game trivia))
– For too much gaming-related trivia.((MOSLOW))
– For list that does not follow the Manual of Style for lists of works, e.g. not in chronological order((Cleanup university))
, ((Cleanup school))
– For excessive detail about an educational institution.((Famous))
– For an indiscriminate list of "famous" people associated in some way with a topic.((Localist))
– For local-interest trivia that is unverifiable or otherwise unencyclopedic.((Prose))
– Suggests converting into prose a section that consists of a list.((Cleanup list))
– For indiscriminate lists that need reduction.((List to table))
– For use where a table would be better than a list.