This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemistry This template is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Energy This template is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles

This revert was in error because it replaced a cell's most typical name with a redirect from a much less common name to the same article. 99.38.148.203 (talk) 17:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Banned user Banned user Nrcprm2026 is not permitted to contribute.Hipocrite (talk) 20:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest a starting point, go to Hipocrite's talk page ask why they are reverting. Right now there is not much to give a third opinion on, since there is no discussion here. If the two of you talk, maybe it can be worked out between you without any other involvement. I will remove the third opinion request and if a conversation with Hipocrite do not work out come back and ask for a third opinion again. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 18:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest include parameters for the anode, cathode and electrolyte chemistries, when discharging.--Lagoset (talk) 12:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]