Why this template should always be used with subst: ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a01:e35:8a8d:fe80:dc2a:4cc2:f69c:9e36 (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
There is something about this template that is causing the text immediately following it on the same line to end up in a <code>-style box. This happens whether it is transcluded or substituted.
Examples:
((WikiThanks)) Some text that follows.
producesWhile ((subst:WikiThanks)) Some text that follows.
producesThank you
Some text that follows.
This does not seem to happen if a newline (<br />) is inserted immediately after the template. Examples:
((WikiThanks))<br/> Some text that follows.
producesand ((subst:WikiThanks))<br/> Some text that follows.
produces Thank you
Some text that follows.
I don't know if it's an issue with the template or something else. But it's a minor thing that's seriously bugging me. --talk2Chun(talk) (contributions) 20:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
((subst:WikiThanks)) Some text that follows.
should produce