This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
There has been some discussion about the usefulness of this. I suspect that if the flag were smaller it may not raise as many hackles. Is there any way to reduce the flag's size? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay Walter, I've set the size to 45 pixels ;-D Maiō T. (talk) 20:51, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello everybody, what's your opinion on these flagicons? A year ago, they were the same (100px wide). But then came User:Ohconfucius and (without any discussion) reduced it to 50px and then once more. I think, the best would be something in between. Maiō T. (talk) 22:22, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This discussion might be covered by WP:BIKESHED, but unless I'm mistaken, didn't the discussion at WT:FOOTY arrive at the consensus that a smaller icon was better? APerson (talk!) 02:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so. I'm gonna equalize both templates to 60px. Any objections? Maiō T. (talk) 12:18, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@APerson:Could you please give a link to the discussion at WT:FOOTY? Rider ranger47Talk 00:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would support that change, per the WT:FOOTY people from the discussion who supported making it smaller. Making these boxes more unobtrusive would be a positive change. APerson (talk!) 18:28, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]