Quicklinks
Over-hasty Speedy Deleters CSD A1 Survey CSD A7 Survey CSD G1 Survey CSD G10 Survey Survey Monkey Surveys 1.1-1.2-1.3- 1.4-1.5-1.6- 1.7-1.8-1.9- 1.10 2.1- 2.2- 2.3-2.4- 2.5-2.6- 2.7- 2.8- 2.9- 2.10 3.1- 3.2 -3.3-3.4-3.5-3.6- 3.7-3.8- 3.9- 3.10 4.1-4.2-4.3-4.4-4.5-4.6-4.7-4.8
Other Excellent articles on CSD
Field guide to proper Speedy Deletion Overturned Speedy Deletions Ten Commandments of CSD
v t e

Original Article

XYZ middle school is horrible never go to this school!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! believe me

Nomination Criteria

G10 Pages that serve no purpose but to disparage or threaten their subject or some other entity (e.g., "John Q. Doe is an imbecile"). These are sometimes called "attack pages". This includes legal threats, and may also include a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the page history to revert to. Administrators deleting such pages should not quote the content of the page in the deletion summary, and if the page is an article about a living person it should not be restored or recreated by any editor until it meets biographical article standards.

Deletion Options

**Deletion Option**
rationale	Count	Percent
Agree with ratioinale to speedy delete.	67	75.3
Disagree with rationale to speedy delete, but deletable by other criteria.	15	16.9
Disagree with rationale to speedy delete, but this is a case where IAR applies.	4	4.5
Disagree with speedy deletion.	3	3.4

Survey Comments

**Deletion Option**
Common rationale	Count
G3	5
G2	2
A1	1

Debatable. I would most likely delete this under G3, but I would probably not challenge someone deleting it under G10.
agree with rationale, assuming there is no better version in page history
Check article history - this reads more like fly-by vandalism. If not, speedy G10 it.
Passes a few other criteria as well (G3 on vandalism for example), but clearly this article is an attack.
Check quickly to ensure this school exists, rewrite stub to say "XYZ is a Middle School in Nowhere." and tag as a stub.
If the city the school is in is not discernable given only the name of the school (so that it can't be redirected there) I would delete as nocontext. Otherwise I'd redirect to city article.
The assumptions implicit in G10 are a bit strong here, but it's definitely an attack. If G10 doesn't completely apply, patch it with a glob of IAR.
G3 would probably be more applicable here. No direct attack, but certainly vandalism
Since the tone is one that sounds like a crybaby, it's a very weak G10. G3 may also apply unless the school really is horrible, e.g. fails state standards.
Were it a high school, I might try to salvage a stub out of it. But I wouldn't waste my time on a middle school.

Balloonman's analysis

Deleting this article per G3 or G10 are both perfectly acceptable.

More