For some strange reason, I'm interested in the impact of blogs (and New Media in general) on the 'real' (ie., off-internet) world, in particular on newspapers and (to a lesser extent) TV news programs. (But I'm not that interested in the internet organization that is really hurting newspapers.) So I tend to edit articles about blogs, mostly conservative political blogs, and related topics. (My other main topics are computing (my profession), SF/F authors and books and computer games.) I'm here to further the aims of the project, but I also browse Arbcom cases, ANI, etc out of interest in how a bunch of smart people try to create new internet-only forms of governance while dealing with old problem that all large volunteer-run organizations face.
I also came here to improve my prose style through practice; you can see by the last sentence of the preceding paragraph that I still have plenty of room for improvement.
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chris_Chittleborough.
Wikimedia Foundation
Personal Notes
My full name is Christopher William Chittleborough, which takes a while to say or type. I sometimes use "Chris[topher] Chittleborough" as a signature on Internet forums, etc.
My current Wikipedia signature is "CWC". From 17-Apr-2006 to 19-Mar-2007, it was "CWC(talk)". Before that, it was simply "User:Chris Chittleborough", resulting in some awkward page layouts.
Wikipedia activities
The articles I edit are mostly about computing, games and "New Media" (blogs etc). Recently, I've been trying to help out at WP:BLPN.
I have found that that is the goal of most users who practice such disruption--to bait you into "betraying your frustration". 172 gave some good advice when he said "Don't abuse yourself by responding" to pure disruption. Just relax, count to 10 and keep your discussion on topic and he'll move on or be dealt with by an admin.[4]
[W]hat is great about that advice, WilliamThweatt, is that it doesn't violate the assumption of good faith, it works just as well whether someone is, or isn't, disrupting on purpose. So I sure do endorse it![5]
[I offer] a piece of advice that I tell my kids and I have to tell myself occasionally: "You can't control other people ... you only control how you react to them".[7]
[P]eople have said that Wikipedia is not in the truth business. Well guess what? We are not in the lie business either. Attempting to use this respectable encyclopedia to promote deceptions against true knowledge shouldn’t be tolerated. In fact, the removal of POV violations that were in direct conflict with our policies & guidelines is something that should be rewarded. I am in support of anyone who will refuse to allow this project to be used as a platform or soapbox to spread propaganda lies.[8]
This article is excellent. When I looked into the origins of ASCII a few years ago, it took me days of Googling (or was it AltaVista-ing?) to get this information, and even then I didn't get it all. In fact, I originally joined Wikipedia solely to remove some vandalism from the article.
There's a good essay on inclusionism/deletionism/mergism here.
In Image specs, "|frame|" always uses the original image size. To get a border and a caption on a scaled image, you have to use "|thumb|Npx|" — the "|thumb|" specifies scaling with a caption and a border, and the "|Npx|" specifies the size, overriding the thumbnail size from the user's preferences. See Wikipedia:Extended image syntax for more details.
I have been putting double square brackets around every year number in articles (eg., 1955 → 1955), following the example of previous editors of articles I looked at. This turns out to be a well-known newbie mistake. However, the correct policy is not obvious. It was only by chance that I discovered this (from Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)), and it took a bit of searching to find a clear statement in Wikipedia:Make_only_links_relevant_to_the_context.
As of 08:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC), Wheat Belt just redirects to Wheatbelt region of Western Australia. Someone should write a proper article on this important part of Australia's geography and economy.
