A collection of phylogenetic trees for the caniform carnivores. The cladograms were copied from Wikipedia mainspace articles and used to test the Lua module version of the ((clade)) using the test template ((cladeN)).
Note: "Recently, however, Schmidt-Kittler (1976; Chen & Schmidt-Kittler 1983) has demonstrated, on the basis of the structure of the deciduous dentition, that percrocutoids are likely to be phylogenetically quite distant from hyaenids sensu stricto, and instead share a common ancestry with
'stenoplesictines' (Chen & Schmidt-Kittler 1983, p. 168)." (Werdelin & Solounias, 1991, p5)
Werdelin , Lars & Solounias, Nikos 1991 05 31: The Hyaenidae: taxonomy, systematics and
evolution. Fossils and Strata, No. 30, pp. 1-104. Oslo. ISSN 0300-9491 . ISBN82-00-37481-5 .
From: Caniformia#Phylogeny Note redundancy with main carnivore scheme. Transcluded templates would be an improvement. I've added the canine subfamilies.
Cladogram showing the results of the recent molecular studies.[9][10][11] Genus Nasuella was not included in these studies, but in a separate study was found to nest within Nasua.[12]
^Wang, Xiaoming; Richard Tedford; Beryl Taylor (1999-11-17). "Phylogenetic systematics of the borophaginae". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 243. hdl:2246/1588.
^ abcWang, Xiaoming; Tedford, Richard H.; Dogs: Their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
^ abR.M. Nowak (2003). "Chapter 9 - Wolf evolution and taxonomy". In Mech, L. David; Boitani, Luigi (eds.). Wolves: Behaviour, Ecology and Conservation. University of Chicago Press. pp. 239–258. ISBN978-0-226-51696-7.
^K.-P. Koepfli; M. E. Gompper; E. Eizirik; C.-C. Ho; L. Linden; J. E. Maldonado; R. K. Wayne (2007). "Phylogeny of the Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carvnivora): Molecules, morphology and the Great American Interchange". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 43 (3): 1076–1095. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.10.003. PMID17174109.
^Berta, A.; Churchill, M. (2012). "Pinniped taxonomy: Review of currently recognized species and subspecies, and evidence used for their description". Mammal Review. 42 (3): 207–34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2011.00193.x.