This is the user sandbox of Shiv2601. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

The Future of Leadership

[edit]
Future of leadership Initial banner

Introduction

[edit]
Past Leadership.
Past.

Historically, leadership has been associated with command and control structures and a predominance of aggressive, results driven achievers who assert control within a hierarchical organization model. In an increasingly volatile and unpredictable business environment where organizational boundaries are blurred, effective leadership is still viewed as central to organizational success but the leadership characteristics, key competencies and qualities, as well as the overall approach to leadership development are changing.

Organizations need to continuously adapt if they are to survive and thrive in an increasingly volatile business environment. Ensuring successful adaptation against a backdrop of increasing uncertainty and complexity means future leadership becomes less about directive structured approaches seeking predictable outcomes and more about empowering others to make effective and timely decisions. Today’s winning organizations are horizontal, not hierarchical in structure. Collaboration, Communication and most importantly Creativity in approach to deal with new situations and business scenarios are becoming the key facets for leaders of the future. This wiki considers the current state of leadership, the key challenges as well as trends and puts forward the required competencies for leaders of the future and together with their development and identification.[1]

Current State & Key Challenges

[edit]
Current Leadership.
Present.

It’s never been easier to start a business. However, staying in business and making profits is challenging. The ease of starting a business creates a broader level of competition with every business trying to woe their customers. Some companies focus on one product and try to be best in doing one thing. Apart from stiff competition, the speed in which economy and technologies are changing means, the successful business model of yesterday might not work today and prove to be a disaster tomorrow. So hindsight and all of the previous business experiences might not lead to foresight. The sad thing is that uncertainty always leads to a short-term focus. Companies are shying away from long-term planning but rather focusing on short-term gains. While this might feel right, but failure to strategically plan five to ten years into the future can end up destroying business.[2]

Following are some of the key business challenges leaders are facing today

[edit]
Future Leadership.
Future.

There are key trends that are driving the need for change in leadership approach and associated competencies.

Qualities of Future Leaders

[edit]

Many industries have entered into a period of increasingly rapid change, which will only continue to accelerate due to trends currently foreseen in the marketplace. Businesses of the future will recognize that over-arching bureaucratic mechanisms will no longer allow organizations to evolve swiftly enough to remain relevant and competitive. The days of 'heroes' at the top of a company dictating strategy which is then executed in a command and control structure are over.[5]

The greatest challenge for future leaders will be keeping even with the pace of change, as well as dealing with the multi-dimensional aspect of problems faced in an ever interconnected world. To be successful, leaders must migrate from easily defined individual behaviors to competencies that will equip them to navigate an environment expected to be unpredictable, complicated, indefinite and unclear.[5]

Leadership Development

[edit]

Weak bench strength was identified as the greatest leadership challenge by HR executives attending a series of roundtables hosted by Mercer, Oliver Wyman and Harvard Business School Publishing. Of 30 executives attending, over 40% indicated having a shortage in bench strength that is required to meet future market growth and business requirements, as well as a lacking talent pool to be able draw upon for succeed leaders leaving critical roles.[8]

Increasingly, organizations are recognizing leadership is embodied in the company culture and through the capabilities of all its employees, not just a few people. Current and anticipated business challenges and trends are leading HR and senior business executives to form new views on what defines leadership. A fresh perspective of the competencies that must be nurtured to grow leaders of the future will demand an assessment of effectiveness of traditional development practices.[8]

Role of Business Schools

When asked about the role of business schools and MBAs in developing future leaders, half the respondents to a survey by the Institute of Leadership & Management were neutral when it came to the effectiveness of educational institutions in growing leadership capacity. MBAs were viewed to be of value in establishing an individual has a certain level of knowledge, but they do not address the experiential learning required to comprehend how to thrive in company within the interconnected business world. Possession of an MBA indicates a person is academically able to lead, but it is not an indication whether he or she can definitely do so. A balanced mix of skills and experience is what distinguishes persons with the potential for future leadership.[9]

Effectiveness of Current Practices

HR and L&D departments are becoming increasingly important to building a pipeline of talent capable of leading through chaotic business change. However, it seems managers and senior executives are coming to believe the leadership programs in place today are insufficient to develop a capacity to face the demands of even their current roles.[10]

The most common development methods currently in practice are:

While the above-mentioned methods will remain important into the future, many HR professionals are questioning if they are continued in their current formats, they will be sufficient to develop leaders to the levels needed to meet the challenges of the coming age.[10]

[edit]

HR executives are responsible for assisting organizations in finding and developing leaders that will propel their companies forward – and then for helping those leaders to succeed. The challenge of comprehending the essence of leadership, while creating and deploying effective leadership development practices will likely be greater than ever before. These practices will be required to become better integrated with organizational business challenges and systems. Requiring a ROI will encourage greater rigor and clarity in the creation of leadership development programs and how their business impact can be measured.[4]

Increased Focus on Vertical Development
[edit]

Leadership development has long been thought to be working out what competencies a leader should possess and then helping individual managers to develop them. Many executives have grown weary of the competency model as the sole means for developing leaders, because they do not distinguish between vertical and horizontal learning.[4]

Technical learning to develop new skills, abilities and behaviors is horizontal development. It is most useful when a problem is clearly defined and techniques are known for solving it. In contrast, vertical developmentrefers to the “stages” that people progress through as they “make sense” of their world.[4]

Researchers have demonstrated that adults continue to progress (at varying rates) through predictable stages of mental development. At each higher level of mental capacity, people “make sense” of the world in more complex and wide-ranging ways. When a person’s mind has been stretched thru vertical development, perform better in more complex environments because they can think in more complex ways.[4]

Transfer of Developmental Ownership to the Individual
[edit]

While many companies will state they need leaders at all levels of the business, but their stated objective is inconsistent with their practices when only high-potential managers are trained and developed. Many employees have the perspective their personal development is owned by someone else, i.e., their own manager, HR, training consultants, etc. Social psychologists indicate a human being’s motivation to grow is highest when they feel a sense of autonomy over their own learning and development. If the experience of development is combined with a sense of self-sufficiency over the professional growth process, an individual’s motivation to succeed is more likely to increase.[4]

Decline of the Heroic Leader & Rise of Collective Leadership
[edit]

The last fifty years of leadership development has been the story of the individual. Whole generations of people advanced as a result development practices that moved them toward the ideal leader, as defined by the understanding of leadership in their time.[4]

Organizational theorists are shifting the focus of leadership from a person or role, to leadership as a process. The key distinction in mindset is that leadership can be enacted by anyone; it is not tied to a position of authority in the hierarchy. It is believed leadership becomes more straightforward and uncomplicated when it is exercised from a position outside of authority More importantly, this definition of leadership does not tie to the acts of an individual, but is free to be distributed throughout networks of people, across organizational boundaries and geographic locations. Identification of a leader becomes less important than determination of what is needed within the system and how it can be produced.[4]

A New Era Leadership Development Innovation
[edit]

While it will be easy for organizations to repeat the leadership practices that they have traditionally used, continuing to do so makes little sense if those methods were created to solve the problems of the past. Innovation will be required to move leadership development from a retrospective reaction to a forward sensing process.[4]

L&D innovators must be prepared to experiment and fail in the creation of new approaches to gain insights for the next round of development program evolution. They will look to find collaborators inside and outside their own organizations who they can join with in creating learning models that push the limits of existing practices. In the future, leadership development networks will need to increase the number of perspectives brought together, by going beyond the L&D development community to engage other stakeholders for formulation of transformative innovations.[4]

Different skill sets will be required of L&D professionals to transfer them from being authors of leadership development programs to becoming the social facilitators of transforming ideas harvested from all the stakeholders in the system. Great breakthroughs may not turn out to be the practices that are created, but the social networking process that is deployed to continuously identify new practices to deploy across the community.[4]

Building a Pipeline of Talent
[edit]


The strength and depth of the leadership talent pool

Demographic changes and globalization will drive persistent talent shortages in the future. Workforces will evolve as an aging populace retires and international demand for skills increases. Organizations will have to go to battle to obtain resources drawn from an extraordinarily diverse pool of potential employees. Generation of a strong leadership pipeline requires concentration on the attraction, development and retention of leaders across all levels in the organization.[1]

One of the most undervalued facets of executive talent management is the effort and discipline required to deploy and sustain a process to drives positive results. The process includes compilation and review of information pertaining to potential and emerging leaders, provides insight as to their readiness to take on new roles and responsibilities and supplies development opportunities and other support to help them succeed. Each organization must determine its own unique business needs to ensure a proficient talent management process. Three factors will underpin success:[8]

The real challenge is in creating a process that top leadership buys into and actively supports to ensure it will endure. Those administering the process must determine the point at which executives believe the value derived exceeds the effort invested, where they are willing to set aside their individual interests and make talent-related decisions to benefit the overall organization.[8]

Self-Directed Leadership Exercises

[edit]

http://www.newworldofwork.co.uk/2013/12/12/how-to-be-a-better-leader-practical-steps-and-exercises/

Resources

[edit]

The following resources provide some views and discussions on the future of leadership:

References

[edit]

The following references have been used in preparing this wiki:

  1. ^ a b Hutchins, Giles, “Leadership for the future: diversity, creativity and co-creation”. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/leadership-future-diversity-creativity-cocreation
  2. ^ a b c d e f Conner, Cheryl, “8 Great' Challenges Every Business Faces (And How To Master Them All)”. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/cherylsnappconner/2013/03/04/the-8-great-challenges-every-business-faces-and-how-to-master-them-all/
  3. ^ a b c d e f Vielmetter, Georg, Sell, Yvonne (2014) Leadership 2030: The Six Megatrends You Need to Understand to Lead Your Company into the Future. American Management Association. ISBN 978-0-8144-3725-4
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Petrie, Nick, “Future Trends in Leadership Development”. Retrieved from http://www.ccl.org/leadership/pdf/research/futureTrends.pdf?campaign=HP0813
  5. ^ a b c d e f g Entrepreneur. (2013), "10 Qualities Every Leader of the Future Needs to Have”. Retrieved from http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/229646]
  6. ^ Gallup Business Journal. (2000), Retrieved from http://businessjournal.gallup.com/content/628/adaptability.aspx
  7. ^ Emotional Intelligence. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved April 34, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_intelligence Cite error: The named reference "selfaware" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  8. ^ a b c d e f g 10. Harvard Business School Publishing, Mercer, Wymans, Oliver, “What the future demands: The growing challenge of global leadership development’. Retrieved from https://www.mmc.com/knowledgecenter/The_Growing_Challenge_Of_Global_Leadership_Development.pdf
  9. ^ Institute of Leadership & Management. (2010), “Creating Future Leaders”. Retrieved from https://www.i-l-m.com/Information-for-centres/Winning-business/research-reports/Creating-future-leaders
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h 3. Hernez-Broome, G. and Hughes, R.L., (2004), Leadership Development: Past, Present, and Future, Human Resource Planning, Vol 27, Iss 1, pp 24-32, Human Resource Planning Society, New York Cite error: The named reference "ppf" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).