Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jenny Durkan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are lying. That was hardly a disruptive edit and you know it.--174.21.179.79 (talk) 14:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Somville243. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Drmies (talk) 02:56, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are lying. I did not attack SomRx, I defended the editor and clearly stated that I thought that your ban was completely overboard. That was, and is, my sincere opinion. And I was not "gravedancing", I was making fun of you.--174.21.179.79 (talk) 14:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).
((unblock|reason=I'm not really appealing the block, I'm simply crystal balling that I'll probably end up being blocked after doing my best to reach consensus, be forced to accept consensus by default after other involved editors are far too proud to participate and back up their statements, and then undoubtedly be accused of edit warring. I mean, probably. So why not just wrap it up today?))--174.21.179.79 (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at Talk:Jenny Durkan. I asked you not to ping me. I do not remember telling you it's OK for you to call me by anything but my name. Also, "crybully"--sounds a bit desperate.Drmies (talk) 01:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty, I will no longer ping you, but in the future please do not revert edits without reasoning or if consensus has been reached. I am interpreting this as you refusing to be involved on the page, so please do not edit unless you would actually like to discuss. Pinging is hardly harassment when you were already involved. Humor is one of the cornerstones of Wikipedia, there's plenty of examples to prove that to you. The role of an admin is a serious one (I mean, serious relative to wikipedia). An admin should have the courage to step up to challenges and lean in to conflict. An admin should not say "Because I said so, I have spoken" without citing specific wikipolicies. An admin should certainly not make vague suggestions about having supernatural psychic powers. An admin should not snap at someone like Techie3 when they merely voice some constructive criticism. An admin should conduct themselves with confidence, poise and a benign quality that you seem to lack. I sincerely hope that you improve as an admin. Please do not be involved with this article again.--174.21.179.79 (talk) 02:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The IP has been changed yet again to 97.113.252.12. Just being upfront.--97.113.252.12 (talk) 20:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.