Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

I've reverted your changes to Faust (disambiguation), which normally would be good, but it it is a disambiguation page and we limit the links on the line to make it more useful, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages as to why.

--John (User:Jwy/talk) 03:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! LADY LOTUS • TALK 22:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NP83. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Matthew Yang King have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. NP83 (talk) 21:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jess Harnell. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Don't remove content, such as episode titles, when they aid with WP:V. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Andrew Francis, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at 1952 in animation. Matt Deres (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1919 in animation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:33, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2005 in animation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2017 deaths in American television, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. User101FrOas (talk) 19:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1978 in animation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 12:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Legacy, you may be blocked from editing. CycloneYoris ^talk! 16:43, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 1986 in animation, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Attack of the Killer Tomatoes (TV series) did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Grumpylawnchair (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1947 in animation, you may be blocked from editing. ButterCashier (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 1996 in animation, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 23:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Black Pirate—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Groupthink (talk) 16:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Charlie Adler. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by User:TyMega. Binksternet (talk) 12:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rusty4321. I noticed that you recently removed content from Medusa (comics) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 00:41, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ulik without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Ulik, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 19:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! AntiDionysius (talk) 22:28, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For removing unnecessary details. Cheers, Mach61 (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pantha, you may be blocked from editing. -Lemonaka‎ 22:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to J'son (character)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 23:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]