Hi, I wonder if you're aware that many of the external links you've been installing in various Wikipedia articles this morning are neo-nazi propaganda. The link in Winston Churchill, for instance, used a term only ever used by extreme racist and anti-semites, "ZOG" , which apparently means "Zionist Occupation Government" or something similar. I've looked at your edits this morning and reverted every single one because they all look rather iffy. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 12:41, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
What constitues Nazis propaganda ? How the hell does a webpage that has a bio on Winston Churchill be considered a neo nazi site ?
I got a message it was gone but no reason
Holocaust denial sites are not encyclopedic sources; any cites to them will be expunged. May as well not waste your time and ours. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 06:53, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
It is just a news site - I wont use --mark twain[[
Please do not make personal attacks on other contributors. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on the contributor. --cj | talk 01:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
All right --[[User:mark twain |cj]]
I don't deserve this
You've been temporarily blocked from editing for repeatedly posting links to an anti-Semitic website, and you'll be blocked again if you do it again. SlimVirgin (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
Slim Virgin, when do I become unblocked?
I'm going to revert your edit to the Crandall article because it is unverifiable. There is nothing in the article to indicate that Crandall is Jewish, and the statement itself is unsourced. If you had a reliable source news article that stated that he qualified under the Act (not a blog), then I think it could be mentioned, but not as a seperate section. It could be edited into the appropriate section. But for now, it could be a violation of WP:BLP to leave it in. - Crockspot 00:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
-- It's a Hitlerite/Hitlerian holocaust denying neo-Nazi troll just like him and his other form- User:Saintrotter. --86.29.137.15 (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Your implication of foul play by a crematorium is wholly unacceptable without sources to back it up.—Kww(talk) 21:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Holloway's body is missing, and there is no hard evidence as to how it was disposed of. Some 'theorize' she was thrown in the ocean, others say a pond, others say she is a sex slave, some claim she hidden in a cave, and others say she was cremated. My point is - "They are all theories". I thought this page is for 'User discussion'? professor Boris65.12.194.210 (talk) 15:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |