This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Hydromania (talk) 09:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Warner, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:11, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Thomas Kuchel, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:14, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Susan Collins. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Alexf^(talk) 23:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at John Kasich, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. General Ization ^Talk 18:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Beau Biden. Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 16:26, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Nelson. Curbon7 (talk) 18:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Bobby Jindal. Please see the note I left below on your talk page. The edit you made appears to go against the consensus reached at Talk:Bobby_Jindal/Archive_1#Jindal.27s_name, as well as MOS:NICKNAME. Also, please feel free to discuss this at Talk:Bobby_Jindal#Bobby_Jindal's_name_(first_entry). palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 04:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dutch Ruppersberger. Curbon7 (talk) 13:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Skip Humphrey, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Harrison A. Williams. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed that you have changed the first entry on Bobby Jindal's page from Piyush "Bobby" Jindal to Piyush Jindal. Please note that a consensus was reached here (Talk:Bobby_Jindal/Archive_1#Jindal.27s_name) to make the first entry on the page Piyush "Bobby" Jindal.

This is not an anomalous consensus; an identical conclusion can be reached from MOS:NICKNAME. If you feel consensus may have changed, feel free to join in the discussion of Jindal's name on first entry at Talk:Bobby_Jindal#Bobby_Jindal's_name_(first_entry). Unless a new consensus is reached, please leave the first entry how it it.

Thanks, and feel free to reach out with any questions. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 03:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Curbon7 (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Fritz Hollings without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Skip Humphrey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lisa Murkowski, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Richard Shelby. Denisarona (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Howard Alexander Smith. Drill it (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Hammersoft (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CodingCyclone. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lyndon LaRouche, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While it may be correct, you need to have a source to back up this claim. codingcyclone ^{please ping}/_{my wreckage} 20:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Gray Davis, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please take a look at MOS:NICKNAME. Your edit history includes several instances in which you have gone against MOS:NICKNAME and subsequently been corrected on it, so I strongly advise taking a look at MOS:NICKNAME before making edits that go against it. (Roughly, I recommend against removing names in quotes from the lead of an article -- especially when that name is not a standard nickname and appears in the article title.) Thanks, and please let me know if you have any questions! palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 01:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above comment also applies to your edits to Jay Rockefeller and Buddy Roemer. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 01:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Lee Iacocca. Again, please see MOS:NICKNAME. Thanks! palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 22:49, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Joseph Cao. Please take a look at MOS:NICKNAME! Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 02:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Felida⁹⁷ (talk) 02:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]