This is Aakanksha55's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hi, Aakanksha55. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Begoon 11:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
I've answered on my talk page. Alaexis¿question? 08:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited West Bengal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengal famine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to West Bengal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Tamravidhir (talk) 11:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Aakanksha55. I am Tamravidhir, and I am writing to you seeking a collaboration. This is in reference to Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Seeking_collaboration/assistance. I had helped Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad become a GA class in April 2012, however, as it stands today, a lot of its information is not properly cited and a lot of information is yet to be added. Similarly, a lot of work is required to be done on Bengal sultanate. I am aiming the Nawabs page for FA (tbf, even as a GA it stands terrible) and the Sultanate page for GA. Given my schedule, it is very difficult to work on it all by myself. I can do the research, provide with information, also keep helping with copy-editing, but doing all of it alone seems bleak. Given your involvement on certain Bengal-related pages, I thought of stretching a hand seeking help to you, given the silence of the rest. Will be hoping to hear from you soon. Regards and wishes. --Tamravidhir (talk) 12:28, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
DBigXrayᗙ 11:41, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
@Aakanksha55: I hate to be the bearer of unpleasant news, but I'm afraid your edits to Indian National Congress are not what would be considered encyclopedic.
A lead on Wikipedia is a precis of article content. You need to read the rest of the article before you can write the lead. I thought you had read the article, but it seems like you have not. The article already has a Foundation section which describes the history of how Hume came to organize the first meeting with good accuracy and in an appropriate narrative style. You cannot independently write the lead, unless you have rewritten or expanded the article's main body in such manner or to such extent that a change is required in the summary. Please read WP:SS and WP:Lead fixation. To be able to write the leads of long articles takes time. My advice to you would be to choose small articles, even stubs, and cut your teeth on them. Also your citations are older than they appear. They should be:Nanda, B. R. (2015) [1977], Gokhale: The Indian Moderates and the British Raj, Legacy Series, Princeton University Press, p. 58, ISBN 978-1-4008-7049-3 (The Princeton Legacy Series are reprints. The book was published in 1977.) Similarly, Wedderburn's biography of Hume was published in 1913. It has been reprinted with some editing by a number of publishers. A 1913 book is typically not considered a secondary or tertiary source that we can use for our citations. I hope you take my remarks in the manner in which they were intended, nothing but helpful advice. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 05:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
'
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Wedderburn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article West Bengal has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
There are a few small issues with the article I wanted to draw to your attention. Generally speaking text in the article's introduction (lede) does not require citations since this information must also appear in the body of the text where it is cited. I fixed a few easy examples of this which you can see from the article's edit history. However, there is information cited in the lede which does not appear in the body of the text. Again, there was one easy example which I fixed but more remain. Once those minor fixes are made I think the article is ready for its GA review.
Best of luck moving forward.
Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
The gpd(nominal) data which u have provided are just estimation of the IMF. The previous data was actually we're accurate data provided by the State Bank of Pakistan, the central bank. First you should actually compare the worthiness of data before any edit journal quartz (talk) 04:07, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For your edits and commitment to ensure articles live up to the standards and principles of the English Wikipedia. Tamravidhir (talk) 15:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, Kolkata has been tagged for a featured article review. Could you please look into this? There are a lot of information concerning institutions, companies, and neighbourhoods (under urban structure) which need reliable sources. The article is also in dire need of a clean-up, updates, inter alia. --Tamravidhir (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)