You may not be aware at all, but these giant quotefarms flag lists are widely despised by editors and violate a number of Wikipedia policies and guidelines. The best that can be hoped for is their conversion to prose. Abductive (reasoning) 10:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but the main problem is that you deleted +40 sources and replaced them with 1 line with 0 source. If you want to remove the text, it must be done in accordance with the principles regarding the sources, and call for reorganization in prose, not suppression. AgisdeSparte (talk) 10:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A bunch of politicians mouthing platitudes is not encyclopedic. The sources are primary, such as twitter. I have rewritten the material to give the topic the weight it deserves. Abductive (reasoning) 11:03, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain your edits at the Istanbul bombing 2022? To unexplained remove a claim by a far right politician is not really constructive.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are you speaking about ? Where did I remove a claim by a far right politician ? AgisdeSparte (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With this edit, but good we found out it was a mishap. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:48, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Synod of the Oak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theophilus of Alexandria. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of foiled right-wing terrorist attacks, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 22:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jacques-Nicolas Billaud-Varenne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oratorian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TY for your help. Have a bubble tea. — Moops ⋠T⋡ 23:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem ! Thank you ;) AgisdeSparte (talk) 23:37, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AgisdeSparte. Thank you for your work on Volos Declaration. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Hopefully you will write more articles! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn)). Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your article on the Volos Declaration, while covering a notable subject certainly warranting a Wikipedia article, suffers from a significant amount of unreliable sources, biased verbiage, and original research. I have done some work to clear the article of the issues, but my recommendation is that you don't start your articles in the mainspace and instead build them as a draft or in your sandbox. Let me know if you have further questions. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:18, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Chrysostomos Dimitriou is an excellent page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cretans (French Revolution), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:38, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dimitrios Ploumis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AgisdeSparte. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2023-04-13. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AgisdeSparte. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2023 Saint Petersburg bombing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that blogger Vladlen Tatarsky was killed by a bomb hidden in a bust of himself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vladlen Tatarsky. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2023 Saint Petersburg bombing), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independentism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you very much for your time, effort, and contribution to improving and enriching the content of Ahmad Zayni Dahlan's article, and for translating it into French on the French Wikipedia. Well done! Best regards. TheEagle107 (talk) 22:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheEagle107 Thank you a lot ! AgisdeSparte (talk) 00:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you! Enfeed (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Enfeed Thank you a lot too ! AgisdeSparte (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mehmed Kemâl Bey, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hussein bin Ali, King of Hejaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nichan Iftikhar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Djaafar Khemdoudi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Chamond.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Djaafar Khemdoudi. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]