![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I know this may be asking a lot out of both of us, but could we put our history behind us for the good of the site and atmosphere? After reading through the discussions I've had with you in the past (June-July), I can only say that I am astounded at how poorly I handled them; you were right in most of them. Best regards, —Animum (talk) 02:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, recently i tried reverting the vandalism that was done on the article Action. I had some problems reverting back to [1] because it says that there were too many intermediate edits. Can you please return the article back to its orginal form before the vandal vandalized it? Thanks! ^_^--DurzaTwinkTALK (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I am very fond of your talk page. May I ask how you edited it? Although I entirely understand you responsibilities as an administrator, I am unclear on why my page was deleted. Can you please elaborate? thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HellomynameisAmir (talk • contribs) 19:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I know it was a self-nom, but thought you might want to display this proudly:
![]() |
You have been sentenced to the Village Stocks | |
for reverting Jimbo Wales |
Gwinva (talk) 02:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Exblue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
we are the best editors ever and if you must make fun of that then you are not very nice! oh and by the way that is a cute smiley face on that dumb pointless page!(hey)please write back!
A tag has been placed on Template:History A-Class review editintro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
FYI: That same user was banned for a week last night for the same edit under the IP 24.11.226.178; I know that it is hard to use a banhammer on IPs, but like I said, that's just to let you know what's what with that person. --Mhking (talk) 22:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
My recent edits are not vandalism! I am a regular contributer to this page and I have left edit summaries to all my edits - if you were to take the time to look.24.148.1.17 (talk) 17:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey Animum, is it possible to expand User:Animum/reset.js so that it can also reset other sandboxes (such as Wikipedia talk:Sandbox or Template:Sandbox)?--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions) 03:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
My edit to his article is not vandalism! He is a paedophile and I was contributing to the page because it does not say anywhere on it that he is one. Look at the things that he has done! He is a paedophile! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.141.1.204 (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:MEANNUMBEROFEDITS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>((tranclusionless))</noinclude>
).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
The BBC3 website here is incorrect. The titles in the list of episodes are sourced from the original broadcasts and the BBC DVDs, and I will tell the IP this. If necessary, I will insert "cite episode" templates as sources but I really have better things to do. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 23:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:X-years requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>((transclusionless))</noinclude>
).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Gotobottom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>((transclusionless))</noinclude>
).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
|
A tag has been placed on Template:User wikipedia/oversight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>((transclusionless))</noinclude>
).
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed the image of the UN flag from this page, as it is used under a claim of fair use. I believe the matter is being debated over at Commons at the moment, but the UN site claims copyright and expressively forbids commercial use. J Milburn (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there ! Very often we get 'new' messages' regarding some changes made to BASIC. The changes were not made by us, and these messages have simply been coming so many times and for so long ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.204.224.33 (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry if this isn't the right place to post this or if you're busy, but anyway, I parodied your song, Editin', for part of a project. I just thought you may or may not want to know about it. Yes, it's a parody of your parody of Weird Al's parody of Chamillionare's song, Ridin'. Anyway, here's the song:
Well, that's all I had. What do you think? There might still be a few errors but I tried to fix them. To be fair I credited you with the original parody of the parody of a song, which I parodied. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 01:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Nice to know I'm popular. Hut 8.5 17:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The IRC Buddy Barnstar | |
For being there to talk to on IRC, when things are quiet, or feeling lonely, and for being such a great person and Wikipedian! Stwalkerster [ talk ] 18:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC) |
If you weren't male, underage, and in a different state—though, really, any one of those would suffice—I'd buy you a steak dinner. You just singlehandedly revived my faith in the RfA process. As it is, enjoy the yummy picture, and thanks. Jouster (whisper) 01:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)