Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Crimean Goths, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist Hello, I was the one who added this. I removed it because it was loosely related to ethnic relations or differences between the Biblical Gothic and Crimean Gothic, but rather a research based on linguistic evidences. Unfortunately, this website has restricted public access to the article. That's the reason why I removed it. I thought I was just re-editing my own contribution, so I didn't see any reason to add explanation of removal. Will be careful next time though. Thanks for your effort. Auzandil (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add link to user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pablov95 about the 200 words rule 92.17.198.220 (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will follow the discussion. Auzandil (talk) 20:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Auzandil! Your additions to Japonic languages have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I actually wrote this study in my own words. I was changed a lot. It seems like my contribution was reverted by another user who believes an anthropologist shouldn't be cited the linguistic section.[1]

I had posted a study regarding the split between Proto-Koreanic and Proto-Japonic in ancient times I'm a person who against copy-pastes in edits. I strongly oppose copy-pasting in edits. Unfortunately, my contribution has been blocked, so I can't see how different it is from the original research. Auzandil (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 21:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]