Hello Bazonka. The article is a really poor stub, however, Azzam Al Dakhil seems to be a notable person in the Saudi Arabia - see the Google News Archive search for reliable sources. I'm going to remove the prod tag, take the article to AfD if you wish. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 11:55, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
In all other articles of the World Cup it has been specified whether the match was penalty kick or in extra time..I don't understand. --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 23:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zöe Salmon, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 21:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. Have a look at Crown Dependencies. British and UK are not synonymous. The Crown Dependencies are dependencies of the British Crown in a sort of personal union, but are not dependencies of the UK (although there is a complicated constitutional relationship). The agreed formulation between the governments is that each Crown Dependency has "an international identity which is different from that of the UK". Hope this helps. Man vyi (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello Bazonka. I appreciate your good faith edit in the International recognition of Kosovo article, fully removing the sentence containing information on which of Kosovo's neighbours recognise it. I am just puzzled as to why you feel that a word such as entity is "horrible", I've never encountered such a hostile approach to the usage. It is just that across the whole site, the word is so useful in that it can allow everyone to exemplify precisely what is planned, even amid bitter conflicts, and yet it causes offence to nobody. If you have followed my recent activity, I've been submerged in this controversial Occupation of Albania (1912-1913) article. We dispute the title, not so much the article itself. Here where we are dealing with a soon-to-be-inaugurated territory called Albania in 1912 and a de jure Ottoman Empire that has fled the scene and two would-be belligerents fighting alongside each other in the hope of dividing something that is res nullius. The only word I can think of that can serve as an umbrella term for all parties is "entity", it means thing that exists. That cannot be "horrible", surely? Evlekis (Евлекис) 22:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Who decides what are the international organization important for Kosovo? EFTA and CEFTA are not? I haven't listed EVERY intl. organization, although... You're inflexible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurentiu Popa (talk • contribs) 12:59, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
The only historical and international name of the body of water between Iran(Persia) and Arabia is "Persian Gulf". Refering to it as "Gulf of Iran" is absolutely wrong. In fact (talk) 20:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Re the contradict template. User:Hike796 seems to have a habit of adding templates like that and never discussing things on talk pages. Give it a day, perhaps, then remove it, I suggest, unless others join in the discussion of course. Pfly (talk) 20:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
See here: Template talk:Politics of Côte d'Ivoire. Everyking (talk) 22:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Wow. Thanks for the additional modification. Didn't notice the tiny part of Huludao Prefecture when looking at Google Earth. --HXL's Roundtable, and Record 22:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
I've reverted you on Kosovo for the moment until you return. This use of "partially" is considered incorrect by a great many pedants because of its conservative meaning. That is generally a good enough reason to insist upon a certain usage here but "partly" may also mislead. See this description[1]. I'd rather rewrite the section than use language certified as incorrect. Evlekis (Евлекис) 00:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Because in the English language, "Xinjiang" indisputably refers to the administrative region, but the situation is different for "Tibet". Areas with a large proportion of ethnic Tibetans extend far out into Sichuan and Qinghai, and partially into Gansu and Yunnan. So to me, this difference sometimes matters. Maybe not to you. -- HXL's Roundtable, and Record 18:54, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
No animosity, it's just not up to us to decide which China is which, just reminding you that (hopefully) WP does not take sides. Brutal Deluxe (talk) 00:50, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
I stubbed Levantine Sea just because it was a redlink. Should the stub even exist? Does the sea even exist? Many thanks for any guidance you can give. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Well geography of South Korea is limited . a few years ago but that the official sources mentioned were 99,360 and 99,828 today, the Korean sources said they have more time, ie 100 210 What does this mean? well? South Korea just Neighbor north Korea and the other sides is surrounded by the sea and by the ocean. so how increased extent of South Korea during these years continuously ? There are a lot of doubt: 1 - Do (water borderline) boundaries move?
2 - Do small sections of the border with North Korea during the contract transferred to South Korea? Unlikely because not announced anything?
3 - Does ownership of the island or islands reached South Korea?
4 - Does the ocean and sea backward and extent of South Korea has been much ??????!!!! None of this is not rational Meanwhile the gradual increase?
Only one possibility remains that the dried sea
But given the status of South Korean coast about 1000 square kilometers increased during these few years is reasonable? what reference have been measures area? my english language isnt good so you like edit incorrect words (but only words not content!!!!) thanks so much
about china:tibet and sinkiang and inner mongolia (total about 4000000 square kilometer havent native chinese (han desent)and h forget dispart from china in soon about 20 to 30 years in future)Especially tibet and sinkiang —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.103.246 (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi a good man in GBR my idea this:Colonial ends and all of people should know han people is china and not all of today PRC
What your idea about zionist arm in 2012 Olympic games in your country? it is correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.108.28 (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
please read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_independence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_Independence_Movement
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Turkestan_Islamic_Movement —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.78.108 (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
what mean paranoia?
Iranian paranoia?
This does not look as?!!!
look at this:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3wYU_H6IzZY/TW0tWNKXQYI/AAAAAAAADEo/pC4ycKRbPnQ/s400/London%2BOlympics%2B2012%2BZION.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.86.64 (talk) 22:42, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
four section in this arm is enough?u have any idea?
what need point top of I? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.86.64 (talk) 22:49, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Upsurge of protest to the show `s fourth Olympics in June 2007 Julian British National Olympic Committee of directors after the 2012 Olympics hosted by points won during a special ceremony of the official tournament logo, London Olympics was unveiled, despite the expected event emotion is associated with certain types of performance directors in the UK National Olympic Committee led sessions designed logo unveiled the official logo of the Olympic Games to be associated with various margins.
Abundant type of protests took place in British management from this session was that the protesters taken to design the official logo of the games design company that opportunism knew that racist issues that were used to symbolize this tactic by Israel The official logo displayed Drbyayd Olympics.
The British designed the logo for the company to "Jewish Avlynz Wolf" were entrusted with the payment of 400 thousand pounds, the designers gave the company an opportunity to Israeli administrators in the company to plug this particular opportunistic Israel take steps to form the word subtly «zion» in the project somehow put the people first look at this graphic designs are thought to treat this symbol represents the number "2012" while a little careful with this logo can be realized racist intentions. Disclosure on London radio!
But apathy UK National Olympic Committee executives and political behavior Zionist alloy they actually confirmed in the June 2009 year to a scholar in the English program "Radio London" with the secret documents reveal racist take this action.
what your idea about this as a UK people? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.86.64 (talk) 23:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
oh!!!no
crying for what?no crying!!!any crying!!!without sound!!!!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia Paranoia???oh that is bad and not correct word!!!!!
blowjob isnt in dictionary!!!(fun) not iranian advertising=propaganda but arab world caricaturist propaganda and muslim worlds no neccesary point in middle of arm but desingers arm is jewish???
What was needed designer is Jewish? in muslim countries laughs bbc lies.!!! Anyway thanks for your sights(=understanding) and your reply
good luck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.116.213 (talk) 06:35, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
yes my friend it seem to deliberate.yes it is not very important issue but zionist use any Opportunity for propaganda her religion this matter isnt correct and good. about any muslm country what expect from Puppet country?many of muslim country have good relationship with israel example saudi arabia bahrain jordan egypt algeria and........
and israel scare people of world from iran not syria turkey and.....? aramagedon world war in end of world and very other Superstitions but i am thanks for your Logical and good reply
i am a hybrid (two descent)in a ..........? on the other hand i have two nationality
can you guess my two nationality? and How much English is hard(many words about 1000000 words) I want to learn English well It is a book that is the most widely used English words????about 10000 of useful english words(that i am with know of this words understand all movie news and my exams????) help me?????????what good book exist?can you Inset me useful book??? thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.108.145 (talk) 19:54, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
oh you konw many article in this page:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area
many article ommited are you know its reason????
goodbye see you later —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.176.108.145 (talk) 19:59, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
hi
it is fun or joke?!!!
yes this book The Great Gatsby is good but my mean is:most use vocablury have exist such book?(book that have about 10000 most important words that i know those are and i understand Almost all of common news movie and university exams?)If there is no such a book? are u know english have how many verbs?(how many)?(almost) are u know mean of all of english words as a native speaker?
and whats u mean from this:And you're still forgetting to sign your posts i dont know because i havent many Experience in wikipedia how sign my posts?
thanks a lot
Based on your participation in WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries#Territories, I believe you'd also be interested to share your opinion and ideas at Talk:List of current heads of state and heads of government. 203.198.25.115 (talk) 13:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Andorra it's 76 country who Recognize Kosovo http://www.kosovothanksyou.com/ http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/andorra-recognised-kosovo-s-statehood http://www.rtva.ad/noticia.aspx?id=30829 and please don't have stupid! first find the information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.66.95.33 (talk) 00:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
sorry! but in anothers languajes he had actuallizated! it's the problem with wikipedia! anybody write.! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.66.95.33 (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Bazonka for your attention to Environment Agency. 99.181.141.251 (talk) 06:56, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Aye if you're going I'll be more willing to go. There is a town near me called Hebden Bridge and I can get to Manchester Victoria train station in 35-40 mins on the train so Manchester is rather easy for me to get to. Also as I'm currently unemployed, I have nothing better to do haha. Cheers mate, I'm glad to finally have a degree even though a 2:1 would have been nicer. I buggered up an essay on Enoch Powell so that is another reason to hate him haha. We could meet up in Manchester around 12ish and head to the Waterhouse for 1ish? IJA (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)