Best response condition - The best response condition says: any i in the support of x must be a pure best response to the mixed strategy y if x is to be a best response against y . An equilibrium (x,y) is given if x is a best response to y and y is a best response to x.source.
Connect4 Perfect play stuff (fhourstone, Valena, Mustrum)
Kuhn’s theorem (a player who has perfect recall can always replace a mixed strategy by an equivalent behaviour strategy)
Perfect recall (Game theory) Player has total recall if all of his nodes in any information set are preceeded by the same set of moves.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Icarus Paradox, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add ((db-author)) to the top of Icarus Paradox. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 00:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rawr, someone kindly restored/expanded the page with citations. Thanks for the heads up anyway. --BlueNovember (talk) 14:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! You indicated an interest in the Klee-Minty cube. A variant of this cube appears as an example on which the Criss-cross algorithm for linear optimization visits all the corners (like Dantzig's simplex algorithm does). The criss-cross article is new, and it has been nominated for Did You Know?. Your comments and suggestions and corrections would be especially valuable. Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 03:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You've done a great job! Very speedy work. I don't think I have anything to add to this variation. --BlueNovember(talk • contribs) 22:56, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! If the spirit moves you to introduce the KM inequality for 3 dimensions or to generate a graphic, then I would celebrate your contributions.
For a shorter project, maybe you could check whether the updated DYK nomination has been approved?
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello, BlueNovember. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, BlueNovember. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XConsortium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XConsortium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 22:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]