Hi BootsED! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Andrevan@ 02:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. I just want you to know, that I'm not thick headed. I just don't consider the provided sources as being good enough, if they're only about what other people think or interpret what the former US president said. If that's the best sources that are available & there's none where Trump directly says he wants to be a dictator, etc? then so be it. Anyways, I've neither chosen to 'support' or 'oppose' at the RFC. Though, I'm rather surprised that there hasn't been a lot of editors chiming in there. GoodDay (talk) 21:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm also surprised at the lack of comment. I apologize I made it out that you were thick headed, I tend to get lost in the heat of the moment talking with people online. It's something about the lack of human connection/body language that I think hurts my ability to stay level-headed. In regards to the sources I intentionally avoided opinion pieces as I didn't want this to be what other people thought, but chose news articles that have to go through an editor and are much more reliable than someone's commentary. I apologize if I came off hard on you. BootsED (talk) 00:45, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. BTW, ya may want to recommend to IP 67, that he should stop repeating the "If Trump is elected in 2024, there'll be no election in 2028" bit. No matter where he's getting that from? it's an over the top statement. GoodDay (talk) 01:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I don't know where he got that from and it's not what I had written in the article and should not be there. BootsED (talk) 01:35, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:13, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ScottishFinnishRadish,

I apologize about this and will discontinue immediately. My intention was to get more commentators on an article talk page. I will post these sorts of canvassing messages only on sources that the canvassing pages say I can post these sorts of notices on. Thank you for altering me of this as I was not aware this was a rule previously. BootsED (talk) 02:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the ((Ctopics/aware)) template. Hipal (talk) 19:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]