This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
IMO luke wilkshire's old photo is a lot better. just letting u know so u dont find out later from some one else —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.151.30 (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Lack of (verifiable) references; perhaps CSD is a little hasty, however... there is other content online about the individual; tagged it for cleanup/reference check in lieu. 12:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by R3ap3R.inc (talk • contribs)
Thankyou. I was about to over react. -Sticks66 12:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah I noticed that new photo you uploaded and almost changed his infobox photo myself. I reckon go ahead, the current one is really grainy (its a zoomed in area of a team photo if I recall correctly). The photo's you took at the roos game are great, thanks again for uploading your photos. Jared Wiltshire (talk) 01:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Hopefully the IP sees sense and comes back for discussion post-block. I think he has failed to grasp the topic thus far, but I have confidence in the WikiProject's ability to find consensus sooner rather than later. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 15:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi -- I recently nominated Wikipedia:WikiProject Football (soccer) in Australia/To-do for the Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight.
This WikiProject has been inactive for a long time and with the World Cup coming up, it would be good for football (soccer) articles to be in depth and comprehensive in Australia.
If you would like to support it, click here for the project page to cast your vote
Thanks! Australian Matt (talk) 02:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi -- Wikipedia:WikiProject Football (soccer) in Australia/To-do has successfully been voted in as Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight. Thanks very much for your support and I look forward to the work we can do improving Football articles in Australia over the next 2 weeks.
Australian Matt (talk) 14:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've been looking through Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Cleanup listing and found that there's at least one FA and 2 FLs that really need an update- List of Central Coast Mariners FC players, Central Coast Mariners FC and List of Queensland Roar FC players. I'm happy to do them myself, but I thought you might be able to do it a bit quicker than I can. If not, pointers on the best sites to use would be much appreciated! Stu.W UK (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I've done most of the List of Central Coast Mariners FC players - it took ages, so I'm going to take a break, I'll finish off the Central Coast article and get to the Queensland one eventually. Camw (talk) 04:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Haven't gotten on to this. Too drained from all the drama over at the WikiProject Football (soccer) in Australia. I think I need a break from Wikipedia as a whole. If you are keen to have a go at the Queensland article then go for it, my source for the Central Coast was just adding all the figures together from the official team page into a spreadsheet and going from there. Camw (talk) 04:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Fair enough, I'll have a look when I can-got a lot of work this week but probably after that. It's easy to get too focussed on wikipedia and forget it's not meant to stress you out! All the best Stu.W UK (talk) 04:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I was not claiming you did not have a valid arguement, but I didn't agree that a consensious had been reached there yet. 60.224.2.159 (talk) 04:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
i believe you have just deleted my article that i was working on. return it back please. i believe you are a good man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.103.163 (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt response. The title is Ligers FC. I am still editing the page when it got deleted. Appreciate if you can return it and i will make a perfect and complete article on it. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nzligers (talk • contribs) 07:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks to everyone who took the time and trouble to take part in my RfA whether support, oppose or neutral. All comments are valued and will be considered carefully in the coming weeks. Feel free to add more advice on my talk page if you think I need it. SpinningSpark 21:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC) In case you're wondering, the image is a smiley, just a little more aesthetic, but not as serious as the Mona Lisa |
Please give me the reason why the passage "Macro Polo Hotels Group" was deleted. Ricky@36 (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I know the reason. The spelling of "Marco" in "Marco Polo Hotels Group" was incorrect. Ricky@36 (talk) 09:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
I confirm that I have requested to usurp the Camw username on the en-Wikiversity site. Camw (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Would you be interested in adding any of those reliable sources to the article? The article itself doesn't do any justice in establishing notability so it was fair game to prod. As it is, notability is only established in edit summaries. AgneCheese/Wine 04:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
...16 more Unreferenced Australian footy BLPs added to the list. Rettetast (talk) 02:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
No, no i never got round to seeing any NYL games unfortunatly, but i have heard from people who have he was a great player. I saw this whilst browsing the sport articles on Google News, but i thought i'd just leave it up to an expirianced editor to decide wether he should be added as yet. (hence the attached news article). I can't make the article on him this week, too much work, I'll leave it up to someone else, if i get time i'll do a bit.
Yeah it is a lil strange getting him, but we still got 2 players left, and 3 internationals, i added 2 trialists on the 09/10 page, i think Vitezslavs looking to sign a lot of talented youth, but we got a pretty strong YT, if you saw last season, so hopefully it wont be too much of a worry, pretty sure he's gonna sign Gustavo Latrionco (i think thats his name) and James Vaughen, but time will tell i s'ppose./ Nath1991 (talk) 08:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, could you please explain how this article possibly asserts notability? The article itself says it is "comparatively small" which should be self explanatory. The small list of releases doesn't say much either. Triplestop (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
why are you trying to protect Holman? just let it slide Tha trooth (talk) 06:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to say great job with all the players pictures, your pretty quick to get a snap of a new player, you even got some of a couple trialists, i just wonder how you get them, how you manage to get around the player, do you work for Sydney FC or the media?? Keep up the good work anyway :) Nath1991 (talk) 10:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the reference format. For the life of me I couldn't figure out how to do it. Damn FNSW URL formats! Cheers mate. batobatobato (talk) 13:00, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Can you please point out where Erin Wallace asserts notability? Regards, RaseaC (talk) 22:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, you seem to be doing a lot of edits described as "Replaced: Association football (soccer) → football (soccer)", and your edits appear to be changing "[[Association football (soccer)|football (soccer)]]" to [[football (soccer)]]. However, "football (soccer)" is equally a redirect to Association football, so as long as you are changing it anyway could you please change it to: "[[Association football|football (soccer)]]" and avoid the redirect. Thanks--ClubOranjeT 12:15, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Nice catch! Keep up the good work! Best Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 02:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Good job, taking out the yellow helps immensely. Can you crop out the picture frames? The work will benefit without them.thanks...Modernist (talk) 12:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Camw, can you teach me how to do it? It would be very useful for me to know. I have Gimp. Is that what you used? Kingturtle (talk) 19:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello, your addition of Bonneau du Martray was an excellent piece of work. However, I felt the last section was too much WP:WINEGUIDE material, since it reported ratings from wine critics, and therefore removed this section. In my opinion, there may be exceptional circumstances where such material may be reported, e.g. when it is tied in with the description of the history of an estate, but this was not the case here. But keep up the good work! Regards, Tomas e (talk) 09:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Cheers for clearing all that mess up i made hahahaha, my bad, first time in uploading photos. Nath1991 (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)