This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 2005 | ← | Archive 2009 | Archive 2010 | Archive 2011 |
Careful with Huggle. Apparently you reverted a summary-less revert by anon 174.79.8.25 (talk · contribs). I have a left a summary warning there, and a second level delete warning for 72.95.82.220 (talk · contribs). Cheers - DVdm (talk) 22:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Christian75,
You are busy adding orphan tags but please consult Wikipedia:Orphan:
An article is orphaned if fewer than three other articles link to it. However, this is a strict definition of the term and there is still discussion regarding whether to have a more relaxed definition in order to clear the backlog of orphans. Currently our priority is to focus on orphans with NO incoming links at all, and it is recommended to only place the orphan tag if the article has ZERO incoming links from other articles. One or two incoming links may be sufficient as long as they are relevant. V8rik (talk) 19:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Bm gub2 is erasing valuable information within the key words Cosmology and Cold Big Bang - Vandalism undid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.24.75.132 (talk) 18:27, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
I see that you tagged Sulaman Reben and Jahitan Sulaman Reben for speedy deletion as nonsense. However, they were not nonsense: they made perfect sense, but were written in Malay. I have, in fact, deleted the articles for other reasons, but it is by no means uncommon for such incorrect speedy deletion nominations to be simply declined without consideration of other possible reasons for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for this! I always forget there's a template for it instead of just edit-history notes. DMacks (talk) 08:34, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Christian75. Completely agree with your edit summary on the above. (Don't even get me started on Bus Route listings...) I'll do some research on discussions which may have already occurred around the topic of listings to get a feel for concensus, and maybe take it forward from there... or just keep grimacing every time I come across one if consencus dictates... ;-) Best wishes. Haruth (talk) 09:18, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
If there is any doubt as to the lack of veracity of much of the article on Depleted Uranium, you have the ICBUW, a some-what fake organization that campaigns against DU using any means possible as an "editor" of the page. They have no objectivity whatsoever. Roger - DUStorydashowneratyahoogroupsdotcom 208.106.32.139 (talk) 05:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Revision and updating of the Tip-of-the-day collection is underway.
Out-of-date or obsolete tips have been making it through to the Community Portal and main Help page! We must prevent this from happening again.
Please place the following template code on your user or talk page, and check the daily tip for accuracy. It's displayed one day early, to give us time to fix it.
((totd-tomorrow))
Please make the corrections yourself if you can. And report the tip at Wikipedia talk:Tip of the day, especially if you don't know what to write.
There's a tip schedule at WP:TOTD in case you feel like proofreading further ahead. If you come across any obsolete tips, please let me know!
Thank you.
Sincerely, The Transhumanist 01:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
I've declined your speedy request as there seems to be enough context, and it isn't short. What it is, now that's another matter. I'd suggest prod or AfD. Peridon (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Re your message: I deleted the article. An IP has been trying to create that article and another international Disney channel article for a long time now but there is no evidence that either exists. I have reblocked the IP. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:10, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Christian75/Archive 2011! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |