This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 |
The folks with an agenda are editing Kinetic Sculpture Race again. Here's the latest diff: [1] Plus they're making very nasty comments on Facebook, claiming that you, me and User:Nytasi are the same person. I still don't see that her boyfriend's name has any relevance to wikipedia and I'm really sorry they feel a need to take this personal. However, I don't feel I'm the one to make this change due to their comments and again request your assistance. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
a) I don't care one iota what anyone says about me on Facebook,
b) I've removed the name again, for reasons stated in my edit summary, see [2]. Chzz ► 20:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm not really sure what could be different. It gives the highlights of his career in a timeline format and gives some personal information about the man. I reviewed "John Bolaris", who was a weatherman in Philly, and his entry is very similar. In Philadelphia, Bill Baldini is a legend... he had a Day named after him, by the City of Philadelphia. There's really no dirt on him. Please let me know, specifically, what I can do for approval.
-I could get into his background and parents, but I do not think it is relevant -I could speak more specifically about the major stories he has worked on
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Wjbbilly (talk) 20:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Billy
Thank you for your comments.
I did further research on my subject and would like to ask you if any of the following links would make the references stronger. This is my first Wikipedia article so it's a learning experience, so thank you for your time.
This are some of the references i found that thought might be relevant.
Best, Kenneth
Media coverage of Grammy Award winning -
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Escartifuge (talk • contribs) 20:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, is seems as though I am having some trouble understanding what qualifies as a reliable source for my article.
The Daniel Langlois Foundation, where a majority of the information for this article comes from, is an established charitable organisation who has received much of the materials related to this event. Much of the information from this event are not digitized, but rather physical books/notes which are housed in various locations across the country.
What suggestions would you give to someone new to wikipedia article writing in order to fix this situation?
Thanks.
Robinsonm5 (talk) 21:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Nolelover for the info. Just to clarify, the DLF is an organisation that physically acquired the materials related to this event (video footage, audio recordings, papers, notes, etc.)
Since, more or less, what I am trying to do with this article is bring to light the fact that this event occurred and who was involved, which are cut and dry pieces of information, one of which (the artist/engineer list) is cited directly from the event program. Are there any guidelines I could look at in regards to writing an article about an "event" that occurred? Without physically going and tracking down materials, I can't think of any other way to cite this information, or is that something you suggest I do?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinsonm5 (talk • contribs) 22:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
What can I do to make this article acceptable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awagawags (talk • contribs) 21:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi True, SlimCados are a brand name. I get a lot of questions about them and thought a Wikipedia article would be nice. Can you suggest how the article can be neutralized. As for references will this url do? http://www.brookstropicals.com/slimcado/index.shtml thanks Mary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mostlund (talk • contribs) 21:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Dear Chzz, I'm very happy that you r guiding n helping me out fr creation of AnokhelalJi's page. Appreciate your work and guide very much.. thanx... hopefully the article is now a matter to submit after i made changes according to your suggestions and recommendations.
~+BlueBlack+~ 21:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Packmania (talk • contribs) 21:24, 2 February 2012
Dear Chzz, I'm very happy that you r guiding n helping me out fr creation of AnokhelalJi's page. Appreciate your work and guide very much.. thanx... hopefully the article is now a matter to submit after i made changes according to your suggestions and recommendations...
... ~Packmania~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Packmania (talk • contribs) 21:29, 2 February 2012
I'm unclear why this hasn't been approved. Is it because it needs more citations? Or because she, a host of a national news/opinion program, is not deemed significant enough?
A fellow anchor on the same network has an entry.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alyona_Minkovski
VeloVol (talk) 21:29, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Dear Chzz May you kindly tell me which parts I shall exactly edit or improve? I have added both refrences and external links,I do not know what else I can add. Best Regards M.Kafi — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.Kafi (talk • contribs) 21:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC) --M.Kafi (talk) 21:43, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
As you had asked for references from different websites, I have added a few links of the related topic from some top websites. Hope that helps. I can post more links if you want me to. Please check them out. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.96.98 (talk) 22:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
sir well i had to edit and add a little bit of stuff and i have got that this musician had some some in billiboard 200 now can my article be permitted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arafatkhan283 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
The Articles for Creation barnstar | ||
It's not much but it's the least you deserve for clearing that backlog! Nice to see you back as well :) Pol430 talk to me 23:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hello,
Thank you for reviewing my proposed article on the San Diego AfterShocks sports team. My understanding is that you wanted clarification about why this team was notable enough to warrant inclusion on Wikipedia. I would greatly appreciate any feedback that you might have.
You may be aware that men's roller derby is a fast-growing and fairly popular sport in the US nowadays. And, the San Diego team, while new, has generated national and regional notice, becoming more well known in the roller derby world than many other teams that have Wikipedia pages. For example, please see the following pages for other, similarly-situated men's roller derby teams. New York : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Shock_Exchange St. Louis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Louis_GateKeepers.
I have added a sentence noting that the San Diego AfterShocks are co-coached by John Hall, a legendary roller derby skater from the 1960's and 1970's. He may be known to readers from his time with the Los Angeles Thunderbirds. I'll also add a sentence noting that the AfterShocks are captained Brett Stang, widely considered one of the best players in the country.
I hope these additions might help to establish the notability of this team, and I welcome any suggestions you have.
Sincerely, Tom Tomgriff2222 (talk) 00:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
My entry was not an adbvertisement. It concerns items which have not been made since the 1970s, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jchesley (talk • contribs) 00:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Can you give some suggestions as to how I can help meet the criteria. Alex Krebs is one of the most famous tango dancers in the United States. He has taught all over the world and commands international acclaim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tangomike85 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure what else I need to put in. It's much like the other pages of TV shows that I've found. The rejection tells me to look at the speedy deletion criteria for an organization and company, but I'm not quite sure if this is about a company or an organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach8270 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Could you tell me what you need to approve this article? The Band's Page is worthy of an article, why not the album they made? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Sheep_Band Jauma2368 (talk) 03:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jauma2368 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
so wat is the problem huh, u tell me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tzhang0 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Dear sir/madam,
creating a new article about ESJ is very important since this journal is one of the most influential in the southeast Europe. Can you please make the corrections? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VSadowski (talk • contribs) 10:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Chzz, Thanks for your review and feedback. I had received comments from a previous reviewer that I had not included enough inline citations. I listed a number of External Links that should have been included as References since they are all verifiable third-party citations that go to the heart of why the subject is noteworthy. I have made all of his suggested changes, which made resolve some of your issues as well.
The subject has completed the narration of two audiobooks that were published by AudioGO, the audiobook publishing division of BBC. Both of her audionbooks are linked to Wiki's ISBN search page and reference the pulication information on the books. Additionally, she has two additional audiobooks in various stages of final production. In connection with her first audiobook, her work was referenced and praised by Michele Cobb, the president of the Audio Publishers Association, in an article in the School Library Journal. All of her audio books are marketed and sold through every major audiobook publishing portal (AudioGo, Audible.com. theaudiobookstore, Amazon...and on and on).
She is also an accomplished actor and vocal performer, with numerous verifiable credits and reviews in national publications.
She is a noteworthy scholar, although neither National Merit Scholarship Corporation nor New York University publish lists of National Merit Scholars or Magna Cum Laude graduates, respectively. I guess I could scan her award certificates and have them notarized...?
I have chaged a lot and would greatly appreciate your taking another look and giving me some feedback.
Jpbfcgsat (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
I think winning an Emmy (I can add a picture of it sitting in the school office), being a National Blue Ribbon School (indicating high test scores), and having an urban Forest (one of 116 rural and urban forests out of 2,637 public schools) sanctioned by the state of Minnesota are pretty significant events for a public school. We are also a K-8 school, not just an elementary school or a middle school.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Parkview_Center_School
I would like to know what specific events or activities you would suggest to make the school more noteworthy. I am really puzzled as to what type of information you are looking for?
We are at our enrollment capacity every year because people choose (and participate in a lottery) to come to our school - we do not have a built in neighborhood student population. We had a teacher who was part of a Fulbright exchange with a teacher in England last year. Would that tip the scales in our favor if I added that information? I realize a school cannot jump through hoops, but I would be happy to send you a picture of me jumping through a hoop.
I live chatted with several people earlier this week and one or two of them thought our accomplishments were noteworthy and thought I should re-submit the article after tightening it up a little.
I appreciate any personal insight you can give me. Thank you for your help.
Sincerely, Janice Jsankot (talk) 16:52, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
The words I used to describe the school were part of Parkview's application to the US Department of Education's Blue Ribbon program. In order to be verified, the application had to be approved by the School District Superintendent, the School Board, and the United States Department of Education. If I include a link to the Blue Ribbon web site and provide a copy of the application as a file on wikipedia, would that be enough to answer the questions you have about the neutrality of the article? (www2.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/2010/.../mn08-parkview-center.pdf - Parkview Center School Application: download files Word | PDF - http://www2.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/2010/applications/index.html#mn)
As far as the web presence goes, the only verification is from the waybackmachine showing what other schools in the district had a visible presence when the Parkview web site joined the district web site. I will add the link for the district web site from the wayback machine. I will also look for newspaper articles from that time to see if I can find anything. Hindsite is 20/20 when it comes to keeping copies of things. I can then edit that section appropriately. Thank you again for your help. janice Jsankot (talk) 18:04, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
a)
This K-8 public school was established in 1989 and
Respects diversity, Encourages active learning, Promotes communication between school and family, and Fosters interage connections.
b) The school states that it "Respects diversity" and "Encourages active learning". (with ref, of course)
The first makes it sound like it is a fact; the second makes it clear who is making the claim, without offering opinion.
The main issue is, sticking to simple "cold hard facts"; keeping it neutral. Hope that helps. Chzz ► 18:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Chzz!
Thanks for reviewing my submission. I've added some more independent references - I hope this is enough to pass the sniff test!
Thanks, Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianjude (talk • contribs) 20:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for that explanation. I see what I need to do is create external links with some of those references that don't count, and find more that do.
I'm curious as to why 'thesecret.tv' and 'theopusmovie.com' are not independent references?
Thanks, Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianjude (talk • contribs) 20:05, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Specifically, what in the article appeared other than neutral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulhebner (talk • contribs) 21:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Chzz - thanks for reviewing. This is my first wiki submission. Could you let me know if there are specific sentences or areas that give you concern? That will help me to modify prior to resubmitting. Thanks Pkcemail (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. I just resubmitted with your comments incorporated. Best, Pkcemail (talk) 17:55, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello - Obviously no one really is concerned what LGBT Veterans went thru with regards to civil rights while serving our country. Please remove my proposed page for the LGBT Veterans Memorial. 'Bigotry' is far more indexed on Google and we'll appear better there than on the Wiki. Enjoy your First Amendment rights... after all, we served to protect them.
Semper Fi, Dogtags Dogtags (talk) 03:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Dogtags (talk) 03:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
the 600 series was notably incorrect, referring to itself as the Kepler generation.
Nvidia has listed the 600 series internally as an OEM refresh of the Fermi generation and released parts as such based on that series.
the 700 series is the Kepler generation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.4.115 (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi
Being new to Wikipedia could you please expand on why you declined to publish the Independent Pilots Association - UK Pilot Union entry to Wikipedia when there is a similar page for a different pilot union with the same name within Wikipedia at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Pilots_Association
and also another British pilot union also within Wikipedia at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BALPA
and an Australian pilot union at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_and_International_Pilots_Association
This appears to be a lack of consistency in the publishing policy and I would be grateful for your opinions and a way forward.
Kind Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by AviationExpertUK (talk • contribs) 11:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
>Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the commercial links/content you added were inappropriate, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should not be used for advertising or a collection of external links. See the welcome page if you'd like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thanks!
I have removed the link but scientific organizations (such as the ENNS) are non-profit and have nothing to do with commercial content. Reference was added. Thank you for your work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wduch (talk • contribs) 12:48, 3 February 2012
I have added citations that, as specified in the wikipedia criteria you mention, demonstrate significant worldwide interest and participation in this organization.
I should mention that I have no personal interest in it other than as a curious reader who stumbled upon a curious picture of a superstar triathlete rolling across the finish line of an Ironman competition. I've now devoted numerous hours to this because it clearly is a subject of widespread passion internationally and potentially great significance for the funding of a brutal disease for which there currently is no cure.
If you still feel the urge to make a quick deletion of my article, I would invite you instead just to slap a "STUB" designation on it or to attach it to the Jon Blais or ALS page.
Thanks, Celia, another VOLUNTEER — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celiakozlowski (talk • contribs) 14:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Chzz, nolelover or whoever is going to take the next potshot:: From Wikipedia is not the place to tell the world about your noble cause: A caution for Wikipedia editors not involved with the cause]]: " Experienced editors not involved with the cause in question may suspect the new user of having a close connection with it. Such editors should respond carefully, to ensure that by alleging or deciding that the group is not "notable" by Wikipedia's standards, they do not suggest to the new user that the cause for which the group works is unimportant."
I repeat, I have NO personal connection with this organization or cause WHATSOEVER. I had never heard of it before a couple of days ago and have no personal interest in sports, Jon Blais, his family and only mild professional interest in motor neurone disease. But clearly many other people around the world are extremely interested in these subjects and I will admit that I was personally touched and motivated by that, convinced by what I read that this was a subject others might likewise benefit from reading about. I read and now include a variety of online sources, which I don't find "iffy" -- including university websites, wikipedia pages, local news sites and athletes' magazines in response to your changing view (now it's sources, not importance) of why my article should not be used. I won't trouble you further, except to note that I've found making contributions to wikipedia increasingly distressing and discouraging -- worse than a waste of time -- due to interactions such as I have had here. Celia Kozlowski (talk) 15:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Dear Chzz
Can you please tell me exactly what about the article is non-neutral, what information lacks references, what references are unreliable an how I can make the tone of the article more encyclopedic?
I was very careful to be factual and site references so any help would be very much appreciated.
I read the page links you gave me; WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:NOT but I am still unsure on how to fix the article.
Kind regards, Manjula-Jayne — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.249.120 (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Made some adjustments let me know if improved. If not i guess i will bring it down to a simple one liner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelawwq (talk • contribs) 14:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Dear, Kindly guide me as to what more information are you expecting regarding this article as I really wish to add it to the encyclopedia as early as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usama1993 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
IMDB and Discogs are just additional sources I have sent on the artist. There are two international articles ( Fabrika Magazine ) and two US articles, and in addition I have added two more which you all probably didn t even look at. I have spoken to a reviewer via chat and he mentioned that he disagreed with the rejection and asked me to resubmit. What good is it to resubmit if you guys aren t even bother to read ? please advise.
MANOMMG — Preceding unsigned comment added by MANOMMG (talk • contribs) 15:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback. I'm a college student and this is my first post. I relied on the SafeMart website for information and then found 3rd party sources to corroborate their information. I made edits to my original post and removed anything that came from the SafeMart website directly leaving only 3rd party information. If there are other edits that you'd suggest, or if you can contribute something, I'd really appreciate your help as I'm a novice!
In which specific area does the article read as an 'advertisement' ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamparky16:30, 3 February 2012 (talk • contribs)
Thank you for your constructive feedback. Can you please offer an example or two of things that require alteration? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.67.47.42 (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hope that helps, Chzz ► 17:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello Chaz
I recently submitted the article for the Book, Deadest Rapper Alive: The Rise of Lil' Wayne and the Fall of Urban Youth. The article was rejected for the reason, "Not worth of inclusion." I wanted to seek consideration, seeing that this book obtains 6 million search results, has been followed by major news magazines, and is used by Ministers, Jails, and Parents.
This book is one of a kind because it is a Christian Polemic that deal with pop-culture. I humbly ask that you reconsider the decision.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jomo1980 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Does this include an omission of the table as well? And/or just the last column of the table?
I will convert the lists to paragraphs as it might be easier to digest.
Thanks for the suggestions!
Robinsonm5 (talk) 17:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Performance Name | Artist |
---|---|
... | ... |
Bandoneon! (A Combine) | David Tudor (Performance engineer Fred Waldhauer) |
Two Holes of Water - 3 | Robert Whitman |
P.S. For referencing format; instead of...
<ref>["http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/0204/history.html"]</ref>
...which appears as;
["http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/0204/history.html"]
...instead, put e.g. ...
<ref>[http://coe.berkeley.edu/labnotes/0204/history.html 1957: Billy Kluver, the father of electronic art, earns his PhD], David Pescovitz, Lab Notes, UC Berkeley College of Engineering</ref>
...which will come out in the ref as ...
^ 1957: Billy Kluver, the father of electronic art, earns his PhD, David Pescovitz, Lab Notes, UC Berkeley College of Engineering
...Explanation:
I do not understand your comment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.172.71.186 (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello
What are the problems with my submission for afranet. I have reffered Business week and tehran stock exchange for external references. Aren't those considered "external resources"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.178.33 (talk) 17:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the comments. The fact that it is public with can be proven by having a listing on the stock exchange. The fact that it is founded in 1998 and the current CEO is fereidoun Ghasemzadeh is verified by businessweek. I understand that I do not have an english news website confirming that it is indeed the first one but if you check the other Iranina ISP on wikipedia you will not see any before 1998. Although I understand that a stock exchange and businessweek reference are "only listings" but I would assume that it would not be easy for a company to be listed on a stock exchange(!) and be referenced by business week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.178.33 (talk) 17:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your constructive input. I've made a number of alterations to address what I believe to be your point of concern. Before I proceed to resubmit, could I ask you for one or two examples of your concerns, to ensure I've addressed them? Thank you again.
Hello Chzz. Thank you for taking the time to review my article. Could you possibly provide me with a little more information as to why the New York Mustangs article requires more notable information? The annual fundraising events as well as media coverage meets the guidelines of what should be classified as notable.
Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeford5 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 3 February 2012
Ahh yes, I'm sorry, I see that now. Thank you very much for your time and advice. I look forward to more contributions. --Mikeford5 (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your very helpful feedback. I will resubmit in 6-8 hours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RTBoughner (talk • contribs) 18:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
i noticed the champion records article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champion_Records
and saw that there was only 1 reference for the entire article, and it was one of the labels website, and thought that by providing more then 1 reference my article would be on an even playing field as the champion records one.
Could you explain why the Champion Records article is ok, but the Champions Records one is not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.56.56.218 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 3 February 2012
Chzz,
Rejection of this article is quite disappointing. I am a 72 yr. old retired former academic person, and I know of the struggle that a small number of people face finding a say to convert their work from an antiquated file format to a modern usable format. I was speaking to a mathematician today who has a book in Interleaf and could find no way to get it into a modern format--especially the equations. I am hoping my article will be helpful to people like him.
My point is, this article is not a user manual or a technical guide. It is a review of a problem. It is true that few people face the problem, but there are still many worldwide who can benefit from an informative background article.
Please review it again.
Thank you.
Lantern23 (talk) 18:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the advice. I'm assuming I just need better/more-reliable sources to make it notable enough. I'll be working on that for now, I probably won't re-submit it until that happens. Thanks again,
Justin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinmyla (talk • contribs) 19:10, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. GeraldKlein (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
> This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject. Why should information about the most important series of conferences on neural networks be questionable? For scientists, and their grad students this is an important piece of information. It has several inline references and one external reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wduch (talk • contribs) 19:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I was curious as to what types of sources would be considered independent. I believe that I understand what types of print sources are acceptable, but when it comes to the internet, obviously I am lost. Could you perhaps give me an example when you have some spare time? Thank you for your time and input, James
Thank you so much for reviewing my article and sending your feedbacks promptly. I have incorporated all your requirements in the revised article. I just wanted to thank you and also let you know that I have submitted the article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Thomas_J_Herzfeld#Thomas_J_Herzfeld
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrijal (talk • contribs) 19:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Chzz,
You rejected my post the other day suggesting that it was not sufficiently neutral. i have since made significant changes, following the guidelines of one of the other editors, and you have rejected it again. would you please give me more specific feedback so I can understand what i need to change to get this published?
Thanks,
Oliviabuckwheat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliviabuckwheat (talk • contribs) 20:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments. I'm just not sure how else to edit this article. Would you mind looking at similar wikipedia articles on tv news anchors and please advise how I could improve mine?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Cambern
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Nelson_(TV_anchor)
Vosotter (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
The Planetary Award | |
Somehow, you manage to be everywhere at once. This is considered a superpower in some places. Are you sure your parents weren't aliens? Ocaasi t | c 22:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC) |
Dear Sir! The article "Koshiki Karatedo" has been corrected according Wikipedia Rules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koshiki_Karatedo
Would you be so kind to review this article one more time? Thank you in advance!ShogunTokugawa (talk) 22:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments. I attempted to re-write the article with as neutral a voice as I could. If any part of the article still sounds like a promotion, please send back comments referring to the specific sections that pose a problem. Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NAPCA (talk • contribs) 22:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Can you please tell me why Joseph Kennedy III gets a Wikipedia page and Paul Heroux does not?
They are both an equal candidate for Congress in the 4th District in Massachusetts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shineroo (talk • contribs) 23:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I made improvements, more neutral , more verifiable references... what can i do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjbbilly (talk • contribs) 01:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
May i know the reasons why my article "Kolkata Hospital Fire" wasn't accepted as a article?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Work2win (talk • contribs) 04:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bollywood and beyond film festival logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey Chzz, I don't hardly know how AfC works, and I really don't even what IRC is--can't teach an old dog too many new tricks; I've barely managed to close AfDs. I tried to read the comments on your call, but since I am blissfully unaware of the technicalities I can't comment on them. Just this: don't be leaving, please. I see your stuff all the time and this place is a better place because of you. After close to a hundred thousand edits I can say that about maybe two dozen people. Whatever's bugging you, I hope it can be resolved (it's probably well above my paygrade). I could say more, but I might make an ass of myself since I've had some really, really good beers tonight. I'll light up one more in your honor, and hope that this too may pass (remember reading Deor?) Oh, also, I beg for indulgence for typos, haha. Take care, and let me know if I can help. I could, you know, arbitrarily block someone, or kick the dog, if that helps. Drmies (talk) 06:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Have removed all the pirmary research, started with the historical use of the term, shown the roots and then more modern usage with secondary references. Hope this now reads more like an encyclopedia and less like an essay! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickobolensky (talk • contribs) 10:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I have added more references that confirm the existence and background to this organisation as requested — Preceding unsigned comment added by AviationExpertUK (talk • contribs) 11:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, can you please kindly elaborate as what I need to do or include specifically in the article to make it notable. Kindly be specific as what is the problem with the article. thanks shakti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaktisira (talk • contribs) 14:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with this, hopefully the suggested corrections are good enough.
Sorry I was too enthusiastic about the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WelshHistorian (talk • contribs) 17:11, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello Chzz,
Thank you for reviewing Bucharest Symphony Orchestra. I added press refferences in the article's footer, so I may ask for another review?
Thank you!
Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.216.127 (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments, I will rewrite the article from a 3rd party point of view, and see if i can add more research. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Robb (talk • contribs) 21:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)