This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archiving seems to be failing over at the Village Pump (miscellaneous). Three such incidents in the past month. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)[1] 12:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, in this edit CB III made a broken heading even more broken by removing an equals from the left instead of the right. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi @Cobi: What I'm doing wrong?[1][2] XXN, 14:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Some Gadget Geek has passed you the WikiJoint! WikiJoints promote... uh... promote... help with... do... wiki... something... yeah... uh, what was I saying? WikiJoints help promote, uh, wiki stuff...and help with...huh?
ClueBot III made a bunch of duplicates when archiving WT:VG. It had been fine in previous archives so I don't know what caused the issue in 125... We've switched to a different bot for now, but I'd like to fix the issue and return to CB. Any ideas? You can see in Archive 125's history where ClueBot would duplicate the same archive in quick succession (usually identical timestamp, same file size). czar 03:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Excuse me, I have an "issue", I recently stumbled upon vandalism on Atomicity (database systems), there was vandalism made by two IPs, and you happened to only revert to the last edit, that edit was also vandalism. Can ClueBotNG revert multiple edits of vandalism or just to the last edit? ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk
12:34, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your vandalism as you did on Gwen Ifill. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samswik (talk • contribs) 19:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ClueBot III archived my new topic heading and comment on Talk:Rape of Belgium just 5 days after my comment was made [3]. In doing so, it also created a new talk page archive page without linking to that new archive page from the talk page, making it difficult to ever find the comment again from the talk page without going through the page history. So at least two things went wrong here: overzealous archiving of new comments, and archiving without linking. What is going on here? Please fix the bot behavior and correct this action. —Lowellian (reply) 08:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, it would be good to have some guidance on what to do if ClueBot reverts on a page that had indeed been vandalised; however, the version it reverted to is just as bad or as useless as that reverted from. Example. Should I report such reverts through the false positive reporting facility (though it isn't technically a false positive), or go through some other route instead? — Smjg (talk) 23:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
((atop))
This edit request to User:ClueBot NG has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hi I think we got off on the wrong foot, or wing in your case haha. I think I deserve a second chance to prove my knowledge of Billy 'Mcwilly' Davies. All I'm saying is how do you know that what I said wasn't true? I mean Billy is an experimental guy, for example he played Jara at right-back and Halford up front, so now whos a twat eh? JAKEDYE123 (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2016 (UTC)