Thank you for uploading File:Joe-Fortes-beach.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:45, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Eeekster Still new to Wikipedia. I put the name of the photographer Timms, Philip T. In the summary as well as the Description. Can you check if I have done this properly? I know this image is public domain as it is over 100 years old. I just need some assistance to tagging it properly. Update ok I think I have added the appropriate tags can you check? Thanks Coffeerob (talk) 03:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Joe-Fortes-beach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 03:53, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Are you anywhere near John Hendry Park? I am wondering if there is a statue there of John Hendry (industrialist). We could use any images like this and the park to improve the articles. See if you can get a sculptor name if you do decide to pop over and take some pics. The sculptor may have a page here as well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Canoe1967 My reasoning behind creating this page is that there isn't to many buildings that I know of that is:
The only other place that comes close to this is Flying Beaver in Vancouver and it is only a pub and float plane base. If we talk about the history of the building and have photos of the building when it was at Expo 86 would that make the cut? Without a doubt it is quite the unique facility. A secondary question would be how does The McBarge get it's own page??? Yet it isn't even in operation anymore.
Hi Coffeerob. I saw your contribution at Lighthouse Pub and noticed that you cite a blog (yours?) as a source. Unfortunately, Wikipedia considers blogs and other sites with user-generated content to be self-published sources, and does not consider them reliable (with some exceptions). If you can find other credible independent sources to verify the statements in the article, that would be ideal. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Coffeerob. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 15:57, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 24#OTRS pending since April. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Coffeerob. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Coffeerob. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)