August 2022

Cunard Thank you so much for your vote, help and support in the WP:DELREV of Bhumika Gurung. I know you are not interested in my thank you as I am considered someone really despicable. Anyhow a big thank you for what you did as now I can peacefully retire from Wikipedia completely. Wishing you all the very best for your edits! Have a great day! Commonedits (talk) 11:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commonedits, I am happy to help and don't consider you despicable. I can understand your frustrations at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 July 27#Bhumika Gurung as it is challenging to recreate articles that have been protected from recreation. However, Tamzin (talk · contribs)'s block is understandable and supported by policy given your comments violated Wikipedia:No personal attacks. I hope admins will be willing to unblock you if you commit to not making comments like that again though you may have to wait a while as this is your fourth block for personal attacks. I hope you will be unblocked in the future as you've made good contributions here though I understand if you do not want to return. Best wishes. Cunard (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Cunard Thank you so much once again Commonedits (talk) 07:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Commonedits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been off for a while and not been editing for sometime now. I would like to make valuable contributions without making any personal attack comments on other editors. So please consider unblocking me. Commonedits (talk) 07:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is insufficient. This is a collaborative project, where avoidance of communicating with others is not possible. You need to be able to know how to work through editing disputes- which are inevitable here. If you don't think that you can do that, then this project isn't for you. There is nothing wrong with that, and it does not make you a bad person, but this sort of thing isn't for everyone. 331dot (talk) 10:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What steps will you take to avoid making personal attacks? 331dot (talk) 09:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC) ((unblock reviewed|reason= I will not talk to any editor nor talk about any editor anywhere. I will make valuable contributions and leave Wikipedia after I finish making those contributions.Commonedits (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me butt in and try this. Please describe each of the steps in resolving disputes. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Commonedits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will work through editing disputes and communicate with the other editors in a reasonable manner. Please consider unblocking me by giving me one last chance Commonedits (talk) 10:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, this is awkward because I don't remember why exactly I ran a CU on you. The rationale I used was "suspect further personal attacks while logged out". I don't remember what I found, and I don't really want to go digging for it. That means it's basically irrelevant until I do so. However, I did tag a sock puppet, User:Only Smiles No Tears, and I'm now pretty sure that I can say you're also  Confirmed to User:Creativitylove. I think you've also been continuing to edit while logged out. You need to explain this sock puppetry to be unblocked. And if I see any more logged out edits or new accounts, I'm going to do range blocks. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:16, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deepfriedokra I) Go the talk page of the editor with whom there is an editing dispute or the talk page of the article where there's a dispute. II) Start a discussion on the dispute with the editor III) Discuss amicably on the pros and cons of the edit. IV) Finding a solution together on what can be the best edit possible in the article.Commonedits (talk) 12:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Commonedits (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't used the other accounts to personally attack anyone. Neither have I used them for abuse. You can check the edit history. Then why is that am I even blocked for sockpuppetry?

Notes:

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

((Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I haven't used the other accounts to personally attack anyone. Neither have I used them for abuse. You can check the edit history. Then why is that am I even blocked for sockpuppetry? |3 = ~~~~))

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting ((subst:Decline reason here)) with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

((unblock reviewed |1=I haven't used the other accounts to personally attack anyone. Neither have I used them for abuse. You can check the edit history. Then why is that am I even blocked for sockpuppetry? |decline = ((subst:Decline reason here)) ~~~~))

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

((unblock reviewed |1=I haven't used the other accounts to personally attack anyone. Neither have I used them for abuse. You can check the edit history. Then why is that am I even blocked for sockpuppetry? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~))

Commonedits (talk) 01:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Commonedits, Would you kindly list all accounts you have used, whether previously or now? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mathglot Only Smiles and Tears was my account. Creativitylove is my best friend's account but since we both come from the same place, our IP address were same so he too got blocked for sockpuppetry.Commonedits (talk) 03:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category