June 2006 has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. My best suggestions would be to review WP:GTL for setup, write in complete sentences, and make sure information about future events is verifiable. NickelShoe 16:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
I knew about Mina, but I don't know how she was created. Llull 00:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
My reply is on your user page. ddcc 03:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I have unblocked User:204.43.65.1. I can't promise how long it will stay unblocked. If people keep vandalizing I am willing to reblock it. Sorry. Wikibofh(talk) 15:35, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, basically we need to improve all of them. I have worked on Goldmoon and Riverwind, and now Sturm. I can think about the other Heroes of the Lance, the Heroes of the Heart, and almost all the other "evil" characters (Ariakas, Ariakan, Kitiara, Fewmaster Toede, etc).
The Doom Brigade is good enough to add information about Kang (if you don't have Draconian Measures, I can complete the missing information later). Also, the lists (especially characters and locations) need quite a boost, as most subsections are stubs.
At User:ReyBrujo/Tasks, in the Dragonlance section, I wrote as reminder some of the tasks I thought were needed. If you want, I can create a page in my user domain listing all the pages there are and their status, what each is missing, the pages that should be created and what each should have, and some other miscellaneous tasks to do, and then each of you can go there, put your name in one of the tasks, so that we don't overlap in a single article, and work on it, so that when the task is finished, the others can check and polish the articles. -- ReyBrujo 03:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
You know, I have bought the Blades of the Tiger book last year, but haven't yet been able to start it. So, you will understand when I say I don't want to read the article, as it may have some spoilers. I am currently finishing The Black Wing, which I will use to expand the Khisanth article, and then begin with Chris' book. Hopefully I will be able to help you in a couple of weeks. Until then, you are on your own :) -- ReyBrujo 03:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Hmm... I usually only tag articles when they are an exact copy of a page. When it is a variation, I prefer deleting the content leaving a stub. I suggest as first measure to write in the talk page that the contents of the article may qualify as copyvio, as slightly modifying the ordering/contents is still copyvio. If in three days the article isn't completely reshaped, either tag is as copyvio (explaining that it is the same article but with different word ordering and some sentence variation) or delete everything leaving only a stub. -- ReyBrujo 04:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes, the problem is that I supposed any user browsing to my userpage would see it with my CSS stylesheet, however it seems every user sees user pages with their own stylesheets instead of my own. It seems I will have to hardcode everything. A pity, but with that the problem should be fixed. I will let you know whenever I finish so that you can see if the page is better. Thanks for the feedback. -- ReyBrujo 03:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
OK. I'll put the images in this category, but could you include the new images (if they have enought resolution) at Portal:Dragonlance/Title? Llull 21:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Can do. DoomsDay349 14:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Great work in the List of Dragonlance characters! :D --Masamage 05:11, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you have a fairly big list of Dragonlance-related items at User:Ddcc/Watchlist. Would you consider moving the page to Wikipedia:WikiProject Dragonlance/Watchlist, to let it in the WikiProject's namespace? A new section explaining the usage with the Special:Recentchangeslinked link and a comment about trying to keep it up to date would be also useful for others. -- ReyBrujo 16:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the compliment on the Empire of Ergoth stuff. I tried to update the template but something went wrong, as I'm not familiar with the timeline template. I will try to mess around with it a bit today, hopefull it'll work. 15:32, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello! Please do not remove the tags anymore. If you want to temporary disable it, edit the page, remove the __NOGALLERY__ tag, and do a preview of the page. Thanks. -- ReyBrujo 17:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Greetings! I noticed your addition of many images to Dragonlance articles, and wanted to let you know that I really and truly appreciate your work. I would have given you some sort of award, but I couldn't find an appropriate one (sorry!). I look forward to working with you further. Also, good luck with moving! Sad to hear you'll be gone though :(. Again, thank you! DoomsDay349 03:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Taladas.gif. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up. I've just voted "agree." :-) --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 23:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
I am not very friendly with having many images in portals, although my opinion changes when no free images are available. So, I will wait some more before giving an opinion there. Note that massively sending messages to users for a upcoming votation can be considered canvassing, which in time can be considered vandalism. -- ReyBrujo 22:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Everything looks good on the page you've created. I've supported it, and will most definetly vote for it when that time comes. I thank you for taking the initiative for doing this. You are a fantastic editor, and it is my honor and my pleasure to work with you. DoomsDay349 23:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)