This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tetra quark has given you Baby food! Baby food promotes WikiLove through tastiness and hopefully this baby food has made your day better. Baby food can be enjoyed by anyone and everyone! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else baby food, whether it be someone with whom you've had disagreements with, a good friend, or a stranger.
Spread the goodness of baby food by adding ((subst:Baby food)) to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
I know you asked first, and I know you said revert if inappropriate, but, regardless, please don't move pages at SPI again. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Left u a message on my talk page GizzyCatBella (talk) 17:41, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Disruptive edit. --Marvel Hero (talk) 14:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi Deeday-UK! You've been interested in redirect categorization and the This is a redirect template in the past, so I wanted to let you know that there is a discussion at Template talk:This is a redirect#One parameter that might interest you. Good faith! Paine 20:53, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For your tireless vigilance over the 2010 Polish Air Force Tu-154 crash article and for safeguarding its factual accuracy. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 08:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC) |
I'm afraid to deal with this redirect because of the stern-looking template.
To me, an F-85 is an Oldsmobile from the early 60s. And the redirect is to a featured article, so a hatnote would feel like clutter.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thank you for this improvement of "Azure Window". I knew it needed a physical description, but I also knew the one I entered was weak. Truly appreciate the terrific wording you've used. Jmg38 (talk) 00:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC) |
What does "spectrogram of the beam" mean? — Omegatron (talk) 01:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Should MoS shortcut redirects be sorted to certain specific maintenance categories? An Rfc has been opened on this talk page to answer that question. Your sentiments would be appreciated! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 18:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Deeday-UK, Thanks for all your edits and especially the one you made to Alan Kulwicki plane crash. It sounds much better now. - Samf4u (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
aviation, graves and music
Thank you for quality articles such as Ground reaction force, Mildred Joanne Smith and BOAC Flight 783, for images of graves of notable people, for changing from fixed image size to preferred, for service from 2005, and "Great idea this Wikipedia!", - Giulio, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
In your recent edit you inserted the link Sidney. It’s not the link you imagine it is! Dolphin (t) 13:03, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
It's always difficult dealing with TFA. Many editors detest it, as you have to spend a whole day protecting the article. Normally, we block half a dozen IPs and accounts. (I'm not an admin, so I have to rely on others to do that.) To my mind, reverting every change that comes defeats the purpose, but I don't get a lot of time to discuss changes. So anyone attempting a change that's already been debated, like adding Jewish categories to the Feynman article, gets reverted out of hand. (Some people also forget that 3RR does not apply to TFA.) Anyhow, I'm always willing to discuss proposed changes. If you are interested in working on an article on a physicist, taking it to GA and FA, Robert Serber needs a lot of work. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, please see WP:RMUM. I suggest following a Move discussion on the talk page before doing moves like Pakistan Naval Air Arm Atlantique shootdown. These names need to follow several policies and WP:COMMONNAME as well. --DBigXray 12:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Me and another contributer afer looking at reports made it does say that the plane CFIT. Look on the planes talk page please. OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 22:33, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello D.
Now you stated the other day that my language about stopping rubbish etc was bad and stuff. Yes i understand that with all due respect. Now you also said about this not being therapy... to which I am only here because its a huge interest of mine so bit odd with the therapy part, also about you saying that i am not needed here, I don't mean to be rude but if you also said that about yourself then I don't see the point in you saying that.
Anyways on a brighter note, I know how to reference now so that has helped, and another user has stated that ASN Database is sourced so i can use that. But in all honesty along with me being here as its an interest of mine, there are accidents that are close to me, I don't want to go into detail about which.
With jetstreamer I don't know if he has a problem with me or is making fast edits, but he is undoing a lot of my recent edits saying you cant source Wikipedia pages and stuff to which i wasn't a was linking a word to a page about that part (Pitot static system). But I do give reasons for my edits so I was wondering if you could help me? Now I get I've made a lot of edits and you may think im being silly or something, but I'm not. I enjoy being here and I feel like i cant have a discussion with jetstreamer as well he doesn't respond to messages on his talk page plus i have been polite to him.
OrbitalEnd48401 (talk) 15:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
| summary =
field of aircraft occurrence infoboxes) that are often controversial and that change something that is already generally in good shape and does not require much work done on it, if any.| occupants =
field has only recently been introduced in the infobox template, but very few accident articles have it. I'm working my way through them and adding it; I got as far back as 2013, but there are loads more articles that don't have it. Same story for the deprecated | image_size =
parameter: it should be replaced with | image_upright =
ideally assigning it a value of 1.1, which I find makes the picture neatly fill the infobox without unduly bloating it.This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |