Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries by disciplines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calotte (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries by disciplines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Springer and Kerala school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of discoveries by disciplines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Verification and Realization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Clarityfiend: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Writings&diff=prev&oldid=936421547 @ > Latest revision (I used copy of your criticism) Diametakomisi (talk) 19:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of psychopathological discoveries, is much oo selective, and seems to concentrate unduly upon one aspect which may not yet really be generally accepted n When you feel the article is sufficiently expanded and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 00:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

okay that's fine thank you Diametakomisi (talk) 00:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of discoveries of dead notable or famous people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of discoveries of dead notable or famous people until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:42, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of discoveries in geography and geology, is altogether too sketchy, and the items listed are of very different importance. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 01:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of autopsical findings, is too erratic in coverage for mainspace (that Caesar was killed by a stab wound is very different from the modern celebrity examples ) I dont really see the point of bring this together, but you should at least make it more complex. . When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:07, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of biological discoveries, is very incomplete and has an erratic inclusion of subject the do not even approxiate a list of major biological discoveries. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:10, 19 January 2020 (UTC) ==Speedy deletion nomination of User:Diametakomisi== [reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trillion Tree Campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthropogenic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Oceanhero.today requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2001:569:BEF0:C700:74AD:5A71:FE34:1839 (talk) 00:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multinational (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Project Drawdown 102 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. buidhe 22:40, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, you may be blocked from editing. Special:Diff/939364015 I had told you Europol is NOT a last name. Matthew hk (talk) 00:34, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you tell me how the changes are vandalism, you see the source and the content added, there isn't any vandalism there. You are abusing this particular situation Diametakomisi (talk) 00:37, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok it seem you have zero idea on the functions of the Template:cite news parameters as i first warned you. Ok, i missed to tell you for |website= we don't need www in it. Since The Times of Israel is an online newspaper it is better to use |newspaper=. Matthew hk (talk) 00:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. So this not scandal https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB110597211289927835 this is not https://www.ft.com/content/75f6c914-273b-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0 and i need to assume good faith on your vandalism on cite para? Special:Diff/939365519 Matthew hk (talk) 00:52, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe: is threatening when the sources are obvious, (as you perhaps are able to discern), Matthew hk cannot write in fluent English Diametakomisi (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

np obvs, thanks Diametakomisi (talk) 01:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing the name from infoboxes. Per our guideline Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes, "An infobox is a panel, usually in the top right of an article, next to the lead section (in the desktop version of Wikipedia), or at the end of the lead section of an article (in the mobile version), that summarizes key features of the page's subject". The name of the subject is clearly a key feature and should not be removed from the infobox. The infoboxes are designed to repeat information from the article. Thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC) (correction of typo after signature Diametakomisi (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, actually is true yes, but the values were not entered correctly as we both subsequently appreciated Diametakomisi (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]