Hi E.Imanoff! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Woodroar (talk) 00:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
I noticed your signature on this edit and thought I'd point you towards WP:CUSTOMSIG. Custom signatures are okay but they should include your username and not make it appear that you're someone else—like Google, for example. If you have any questions, let me know. Cheers! Woodroar (talk) 00:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)E.Imanoff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Since this account is currently blocked, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Elshad_Iman_(El%C5%9Fad_%C4%B0man)#Meta can you just swap the users and let the editor use the other account? I have read the rules in full and I promise not to break them. I think if I had the opportunity to stay in Enviki I, in turn, would strictly follow the rules. Please activate my E.Imanoff account.
Decline reason:
We can't "swap users"; you must request unblock from your original account. If this is it, okay. I am an administrator and I haven't read the rules in full- there are more than you probably think. It isn't necessary that you know every single rule, but you do need to be aware of the ones most relevant to you, such as the rules that are the reason for this block. We will need more than your mere promise- you must demonstrate your understanding by telling us what you did wrong, how you will not do it again, and what productive edits you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
E.Imanoff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear 331dot, what I did wrong: I have appealed to Metawiki to remove my block- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global/2021-w52#Request_for_Global_unblock - As a result of the discussion, I was advised to write to Ombuds commission. The Ombuds Commission has looked into my complaint and arrived at the conclusion that it is outside the Commission's scope. I was advised to complaint within the local community of enwiki. I will not do it again: (sockpuppet) From now on, my activity will be to participate in discussions of articles that are candidates for deletion, to express opinions, and to create and edit articles by encyclopedic people. Since other accounts are currently blocked, let the editor use the E.Imanoff account. https://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipediya:%C4%B0dar%C9%99%C3%A7i_m%C3%BCzakir%C9%99si#Elshad_Iman_(El%C5%9Fad_%C4%B0man)-%C4%B1n_yanl%C4%B1%C5%9F_olaraq_bloklanmas%C4%B1 Because I do my editing with E.Imanoff in my Azerbaijani and Russian profiles and I do not need an alternative user profile.--E.Imanoff Snatch 19:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please read the message I have left on the talk page of another account of yours, and do what I asked. Also, please have an open unblock request on only one account: remove any other unblock requests. JBW (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
These users may have used vpn, so they collided with my ip address, which I think is worth investigating.--E.Imanoff Snatch 00:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
E.Imanoff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Mr. Vermont, I think something went wrong with my block. I openly demanded that the side profile be banned (later it was identified as socks?) #As I mentioned above, the locking of my account is supposed to be based on the existence of other accounts, but it is necessary to believe that there is a mistake. I am an experienced and helpful user; The admins have given me certain privileges for my contributions in the Azerbaijani language section. Please reconsider the bloc decision. First of all, according to the rules, the indefinite blocking of a user working on Wikipedia should take place only after discussions. But without discussion, I was blocked indefinitely. #I think the problem stems from an IP collision. Now I don't know if admin will confirm it, but it's true. If I have made any mistakes in my activities, I promise that I will not make any more mistakes. #Since Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) is currently blocked, please let me use the account E.Imanoff, because I do my editing in Azerbaijani languages articles with this profile and I don't need an alternative profile. I would also like to contribute to the English Wikipedia. My goal is to participate in discussions about candidate pages for deletion and to prepare articles by encyclopedic personalities. Please review user activities again and make the right decision. I think if I had the opportunity to stay in Enviki I, in turn, would strictly follow the rules. Thanks in advance! E.Imanoff Snatch 16:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given that you were actively socking during the pendency of this request, the block clearly still necessary. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
E.Imanoff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am applying in the correct form, and when my request is denied with such an answer, — Decline reason: Given that you were actively socking during the pendency of this request, the block clearly still necessary. I cannot find another to write to. I turn to you again. Dear Mr. Blablubbs, Mr. SummerKrut, Mr. Vermont, Mr. JBW and Mr. Yamla, I think something went wrong with my block. I openly demanded that the side profile be banned (later it was identified as socks?) #As I mentioned above, the locking of my account is supposed to be based on the existence of other accounts, but it is necessary to believe that there is a mistake. I am an experienced and helpful user; The admins have given me certain privileges for my contributions in the Azerbaijani language section. Please reconsider the bloc decision. First of all, according to the rules, the indefinite blocking of a user working on Wikipedia should take place only after discussions. But without discussion, I was blocked indefinitely. #I think the problem stems from an IP collision. Now I don't know if admin will confirm it, but it's true. If I have made any mistakes in my activities, I promise that I will not make any more mistakes. #Since Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) is currently blocked, please let me use the account E.Imanoff, because I do my editing in Azerbaijani languages articles with this profile and I don't need an alternative profile. I would also like to contribute to the English Wikipedia. My goal is to participate in discussions about candidate pages for deletion and to prepare articles by encyclopedic personalities. Please review user activities again and make the right decision. I think if I had the opportunity to stay in Enviki I, in turn, would strictly follow the rules. Thanks in advance! E.Imanoff Snatch 22:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
At Ruviki, I applied to the admin page for an encyclopedic article by a non-profit organization at this link. Then I was blocked because I was the puppet account of a globally blocked user. I recently received a warning about unblocking my account - after reading the application here, I realized that Ruviki had blocked me because I was still blocked on Enviki, and this discussion said that a user's account could be opened on Ruviki if Enviki considered the user's block unjustified. I am one of the most active users in Ruviki and you will see it clearly if you look at the history of my Elshad Iman account. Please unblock, I'm not Canvassing with my suckpuppet Elshad Iman and E.Imanoff so it wouldn't be right to keep me on the block for long. I ask you to restore my user rights to my E.Imanoff account. --E.Imanoff Snatch 22:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
E.Imanoff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand the reasons given for the block. However, I would absolutely beg for an administrator to review my edit and contribution history again. I understand that the technical anti-sock puppetry systems in place are solid and reliable, however I can wholeheartedly put my hands up and say that I have no relation to the accused user in any shape or form. Again, can my edit history and contributions please be reviewed at least again one more time? Or alternatively, can I request to be posted to the administrator's noticeboard for my account to be thoroughly reviewed again? At Ruviki, I applied to the admin page for an encyclopedic article by a non-profit organization at this link. Then I was blocked because I was the puppet account of a globally blocked user. I recently received a warning about unblocking my account - after reading the application here, I realized that Ruviki had blocked me because I was still blocked on Enviki, and this discussion said that a user's account could be opened on Ruviki if Enviki considered the user's block unjustified. I am one of the most active users in Ruviki and you will see it clearly if you look at the history of my Elshad Iman account. Please unblock, I'm not Canvassing with my suckpuppet Elshad Iman and E.Imanoff so it wouldn't be right to keep me on the block for long. I ask you to restore my user rights to my E.Imanoff account. I think something went wrong with my block. I openly demanded that the side profile be banned (later it was identified as socks?) *As I mentioned above, the locking of my account is supposed to be based on the existence of other accounts, but it is necessary to believe that there is a mistake. I am an experienced and helpful user; The admins have given me certain privileges for my contributions in the Azerbaijani language section. Please reconsider the bloc decision. First of all, according to the rules, the indefinite blocking of a user working on Wikipedia should take place only after discussions. But without discussion, I was blocked indefinitely. *I think the problem stems from an IP collision. Now I don't know if admin will confirm it, but it's true. If I have made any mistakes in my activities, I promise that I will not make any more mistakes. *Since Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) is currently blocked, please let me use the account E.Imanoff, because I do my editing in Azerbaijani languages articles with this profile and I don't need an alternative profile. I would also like to contribute to the English Wikipedia. My goal is to participate in discussions about candidate pages for deletion and to prepare articles by encyclopedic personalities. Please review user activities again and make the right decision. I think if I had the opportunity to stay in Enviki I, in turn, would strictly follow the rules. Thanks in advance! I hope I'm able to be spared a chance in this situation. --E.Imanoff Snatch 17:56, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This request still does not address your ongoing sockpuppetry, so this request cannot succeed. Given that you've now had a dozen or so unsuccessful unblock requests across multiple accounts in the last few months, I'm revoking your access to this page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note to the admins: He was banned in Turkish Wikipedia because of he was not disclosuring his paid-contributions. Best,--Kadı Message 10:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC)