EWikted (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand if my test was taken to be vandalism, but I am new to Wikipedia, and just wanted to know if my test was gonna work. What ever happened to assuming good faith? I do apologise for the edit, I really do, I thought experiments were permissible since other users have received "your experiment worked" messages for making edits much worse than mine. Being new here, I just didn't know. I do know enough to know that one isolated edit that was clearly an experiment does not constitute an indefinite block where I am described as a "vandal-only user".
Decline reason:
The expert terminology of your request leads me to question whether you are as inexperienced as you say you are. Nonetheless, see below. — Sandstein 05:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
- Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
- Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
- Click View source on that article.
- Copy and paste the contents of that page at the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this:
= Article title =) - Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
- When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked and placed on probation.
If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "((helpme|your question here))" to your talk page. Thank you. Sandstein 05:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
EWikted (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
THAT WAS NOT VANDALISM!!! BUT A TEST!!! UNBLOCK ME NOW, YOU CHICKEN SHIT BASTARD!!!!!!!!!
Decline reason:
Do you honestly think that any administrator will take your request seriously with that attitude? Personal attacks are not tolerated on Wikipedia. Whether I was willing to give you a second chance based on your original unblock request is a moot point given your disregard for that core policy. Honestly, I might have if you'd responded to the information User:Sandstein had posted in a civil and responsible manner... but assuming good faith is difficult when you resort to that tactic. Request denied. Kinu t/c 16:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I've also protected this page, so that User:EWikted doesn't waste our time with any other poorly planned unblock requests, further personal attacks, or blanking of this page. It is of my opinion that this user will not make positive contributions to the project, per my reasoning above. If another administrator disagrees and chooses to unblock this user at any point, or if s/he disagrees with my protection rationale, then s/he is asked to unprotect this page as well. --Kinu t/c 16:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Uh dude? Are you even blocked? RuneWiki777 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I was blocked after making just one edit, which, I know, was inappropriate, but it was only a test. If I be unblocked, I'd love to take another shot at editing legitimately.EWikted 23:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Welcome Back!
|
Block[edit]
I have no reason to apologize. All of the edits you made on any of your accounts have been trash. Flood my inbox all you want. I don't give a shit.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- ???EWikted 04:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
EWikted (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I request to be unblocked per the fact that the blocking admin gave no reason to block me, none of my edits warrent a block, and I don't even know what he is talking about.
Decline reason:
Per CheckUser and privately provided evidence, you are a sockpuppet of an abusive vandal. --Slowking Man 05:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.