Saga Pagan[edit]

Hi. To dispute the deletion of Saga Pagan, you need to go to Talk:Saga Pagan and explain why you think the article should be kept in Wikipedia. Note that we only write things that can be verified in reliable sources, so you'll need to give references to sources for the material you have entered. Thanks, William Pietri 23:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edmonton pagan learning circle[edit]

A tag has been placed on Edmonton pagan learning circle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stroppolotalk 22:34, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edmonton goddess.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edmonton goddess.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 20:57, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:EPLC Brochure 2010.pdf[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:EPLC Brochure 2010.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Reticulated Spline (tc) 17:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]