Welcome!

Hello, El Zoof, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Simonkoldyk 02:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reporting copyright violations (e.g. Great Man of God). This is to let you know that the contents of an article should be blanked/replaced when adding the ((copyvio)) template. Happy editing, and merry christmas! :) - Mailer Diablo 13:44, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, El Zoof. Thanks for correcting the tenses in the Doctor Who articles. However, I noticed that in a few cases you overshot the mark. Sentences about the actors (like "Ford reprises the role of Susan on television in the 20th anniversary special The Five Doctors") should be left in the past tense, because they refer to real-life events (the filming of a television episode, as opposed to anything in the fictional life of Susan Foreman. That said, thanks for doing the work! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching my "one or two" thousand errors there, Josiah. I wasn't sure about some of it, but my motto is - if you're going to be wrong, be COMPLETELY wrong! I had a change of heart about the other roles, as well. Not sure if it's completely relevant, but it's not damaging the article, so it stays. Build high for happiness! --Me

It wasn't that bad, really! It could be worse: the Wasting is the Wasting. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, El Zoof. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Voga, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Edwardx (talk) 19:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]