Hello Gojirafan91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Flesh Column for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Eurodyne (talk) 19:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A page you created, Gor gor, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 19:59, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A page you created, The Master (character), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 20:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gojirafan91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Flopsy (GWAR) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Goalbox (talk) 20:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gojirafan91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jizomglobin for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Goalbox (talk) 20:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gojirafan91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged World Maggot for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Goalbox (talk) 20:00, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gojirafan91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Father Bohab for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Goalbox (talk) 20:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Goalbox (talk) 20:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gojirafan91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Morality Squad for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Goalbox (talk) 20:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gojirafan91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Flesh Column for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Goalbox (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just because there are such characters in the GWAR culture, they don't necessarily have to have their own articles. Please see WP:Your first article for guidelines. ... discospinster _talk 20:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But they don't have to NOT have their own articles either Gojirafan91 (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, they do not have to have their own articles. See WP:Notability. ... discospinster _talk 20:14, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But they CAN have their own articles. Gojirafan91 (talk) 20:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They can, only if they meet WP:Notability guidelines. They do not.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 20:18, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Gojirafan91,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gor gor for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 20:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not trying to be disruptive, I'm just saying GWAR acharacters can and should have their own articles on here Gojirafan91 (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for creating nonsense pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  5 albert square (talk) 21:38, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would suggest that you use this time out to read the notability guidelines. Not everything or everyone is notable enough to be included in Wikipedia hence why we have some guidelines. Based on what you put in the articles, they would fail the notability guidelines. Any questions, ask me on my talk page--5 albert square (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gojirafan91 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm trying to prove a point Gojirafan91 (talk) 21:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Decline reason:

You've succeeded, if the point that you were trying to prove is that disruptive editors get blocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This request is unlikely to be approved, see WP:POINT. Goalbox (talk) 21:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antarctica in popular culture. Since you had some involvement with the Antarctica in popular culture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crow^Caw 22:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Cardinal Syn (GWAR character), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 03:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]