Hi Handroid7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, Handroid7,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Powstro should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powstro .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Slatersteven))
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Slatersteven (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to Progressive web applications#Disadvantages. Please could you go back and add references to substantiate what you've written? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
You are in fact not correct, article in draft space can be deleted. All draft space means is you have a bit more time to write it before its gets dumped. Slatersteven (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Please read wp:n, no article is going to stand unless it passes this. You will note that having lots of fans is not a criteria. And anyway 100000 is not even 1% of the UK population, let alone the world. Slatersteven (talk) 08:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Once an AFD is closed you should not really post to it anymore. If you disagree with rthe deltion you need to go to WP:DRV, and follow there process. But I am not sure that would be a good idea. Slatersteven (talk) 08:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Windows Calculator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Binary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
The article Animation creep has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to be original research. Neither of the sources provided uses the phrase "animation creep" nor discuss the concept under another name (one is just a screen shot of a quick settings panel). Google search for "animation creep" also doesn't show widespread use of the phrase.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster talk 21:22, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Handroid7! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slow motion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Example (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slow motion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exemplar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Handroid7! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Handroid7! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smartphone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Water resistance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Handroid7! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Handroid7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Zero vandalism, see Special:Contributions/Handroid7.
Also, that last draft article I created was not about Wikipedia administrators, but other websites. A perfectly legitimate article. Sorry if it accidentially offended any of you.
Also, WP:TCAG13 is a legitimate essay, just like Wikipedia:Why not create an account? (I don't agree with the latter one, but just as example).
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:34, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Yamla: Sorry, I thought it was obvious enough from my edits, but let me clarify:
Is there anything else you suggest me to do? Please let me know. -- –– Handroid7 【discuss
contribs】 23:43, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Handroid7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #27208 was submitted on Oct 19, 2019 15:50:40. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 15:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Handroid7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #27223 was submitted on Oct 20, 2019 16:58:01. This review is now closed.