Hi Hurricaneinfomation.! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Hey, Hurricaneinformation! I noticed your edits on Hurricane Patricia and just wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. However, I saw that this edit accidentally broke the template. Templates like the hurricane infobox have specific parameter names that generally shouldn't be changed, as it causes the template to break and not display the information anymore. In this case, changing "fatalities" to "deaths" breaks the template because "fatalities" is the specific parameter name to be used. If any of this was unclear, feel free to respond here and ping me using ((ping|CodingCyclone)) (without the nowiki tags) or leave a message on User talk:CodingCyclone my talk page. I hope this helps, and happy editing! codingcyclone ^{please ping}/_{my wreckage} 01:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KN2731. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hurricane Dorian have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 12:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change images without consensus. Also, please refer to WP:WPTC/IMG for reference. Thank you. Destroyeraa (Alternate account) 22:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Dorian, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not change images without consensus. Also, please refer to WP:WPTC/IMG for reference. Destroyeraa (Alternate account) 20:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. HurricaneEdgar 01:34, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know you created the page Hurricane Isaac, but please don't remove the redirect and replace it with "I didn't do anything, all I was trying to do is get disruptive editing out of here." Thanks. Severestorm28 00:54, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Hurricane Ivan's TCR explicitly states it peaked at 145 knots. Please do not change storm intensities unless the official agency has updated their estimates. Akbermamps 14:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hurricaneinformation. Regarding this article, in August 2020 there was a consensus to merge the hurricane article into the list of atlantic hurricanes. See Talk:Hurricane Isaac (2018). If you disagree with that discussion, please start a new section at Talk:2018 Atlantic hurricane season. You can view what the article looked like before that merge here. Additionally, please do not leave messages such as your most recent edit in Mainspace, please instead use Talk pages. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 00:56, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ishowspeed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/IShowSpeed. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 01:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricaneinformation. I understand that you have been trying to expand Hurricane Isaac 2018 from a redirect to an article. But lot of people have reversed you, and they are correct. You need to stop doing this. You can't create the article just by expanding the redirect, for the reason explained to you above by Gfoley4: There was a consensus, a couple of years ago, to merge Hurricane Isaac into the general article [[2018 Atlantic hurricane season). That is another way of saying, there was a consensus not to have a full article about it. Consensus rules here.

What you need to do is go to the talk page Talk:2018 Atlantic hurricane season, say that you want to expand this into a full article, and see if you can get agreement to do it. In the meantime, DO NOT keep expanding it. Since that goes against a previous consensus, it could get you blocked from editing if you keep doing it.

Here is what I advise: Create your proposed article as a draft, called Draft:Hurricane Isaac 2018. There it will be safe, you can preserve it and work on it, and you can point people to it so that they know exactly what you are talking about. If it gets accepted as an article, an administrator can move it to the main encyclopedia. -- MelanieN (talk) 04:10, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MelanieN: They created the article again at Hurricane Isaac 2021. Noah^Talk 14:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hurricaneinfomation.! WikiProject Weather is doing a drive during 2022 to get all new 2022 weather articles to at least C class, with the hope of B Class. I thought you might be interested in the WP Weather drive, so I wanted to drop a message about it. Elijahandskip (talk) 22:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hurricane Isaac 2021 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Isaac 2021 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Akbermamps 08:22, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend stopping recreating articles like Isaac's 2018 article without discussing it. It doesn't seem like anything will change. If you want to actually get somewhere with it, your best chance is to discuss it with other editors and explain your reasoning. Thanks! Skarmory (talk • contribs) 16:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Isaac 2021. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MelanieN (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a WARNING to stop your disruptive editing - and to stop trying to create an article about Hurricane Isaac 2018. Your latest attempt, Hurricane Isaac 2021, was fraudulent. It was a hoax. It was titled 2021 but it was about the hurricane of 2018. Creating phony articles is a serious violation of Wikipedia rules, and if you do it again you will be permanently blocked from editing. -- MelanieN (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information. such as Hurricane Issac 2021 Star Mississippi 03:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Severestorm28 02:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurricaneinfomation. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry for my disruptive Wikipedia articles and I honestly wanted to make a Wikipedia page but I never had the attention of being disruptive I didn't know I was accidentally being disruptive if you can can you give me just one more chance? Hurricaneinfomation. (talk) 15:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You created a hoax article and didn't know that was disruptive?!? Yamla (talk) 15:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurricaneinfomation. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I accidentally created a hoax what was suppose to be 2018 but I accidentally was thinking was 2021. The article was suppose to be 2018 instead of 2021. I'm sorry for creating that hoax, and I deleted the article because I knew I got the title wrong and I'm sorry for not making notable article relevant to the community, and I hope you give me another chance as I should have not mistakenly title that article Hurricane Isaac 2018 instead of 2021. I hope you give me another chance. And my intention was to make real Wikipedia articles. Sorry for not making any of them notable. Hurricaneinfomation. (talk) 20:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Reviewing your contribution history, I'm not convinced that you have required level of competence to edit Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)). Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 03:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheresNoTime, you placed a CU block on User talk:Marney12341--this is the same person. They're also User talk:Daws1997 and User talk:Jasmine128938298. I think it's worthwhile tagging them and adding them to the SPI, if there is one. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I already posted an SPI based on behavior for the Jasmine128938298 account, so that should me merged or deleted. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, TornadoLGS, thanks. Please tell em that I ran CU on the range I found, and these are all the accounts that were there. Drmies (talk) 03:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, what's wrong with them? Drmies (talk) 03:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Someone else opened another SPI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricaneinfomation.. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]