A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enterprise Group Freudenberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enterprise Group Freudenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hwayang. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Yngvadottir (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Yngvadottir (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry your article is up for deletion. Let's see if we can save it. Is it the company headquartered in Weinheim that is the subject of this German Wikipedia article? If so, someone at the AfD discussion has already found a source that can be used. en.wikipedia requires sources; practically speaking, a new article has to have at least one and preferably 2 footnotes demonstrating the notability of the topic. Can you confirm which Freudenberg it is and do you know of any (other) sources? Yngvadottir (talk) 05:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just saw your message on my talkpage. I quite understand about not having much time; exams and other life stuff must come first. But can you tell me that it is the same company? Is it headquartered in Weinheim? We can't use the German article to suggest places to look for sources unless it is definitely the same company. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:39, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the Did You Know section on the main page right now :-) Thought you'd like to know. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Freudenberg Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.vialibri.net/years/1969/800. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lapablo (talk) 00:11, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]