Insaafbarua, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Insaafbarua! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject Patna invitation[edit]

DYK for Sabhyata Dwar[edit]

On 10 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sabhyata Dwar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sabhyata Dwar, an arch monument, bears inscriptions of Megasthenes, Ashoka, Buddha, and Mahavira? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sabhyata Dwar. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 11:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Upskirt ‎ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. That was completely off-topic. There were absolutely no legal issues discussed in that source Meters (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lily Allen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Stop spamming this article. It's not about her new album, and it not about legal issues related to upskirting. Meters (talk) 07:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Farrah Abraham, you may be blocked from editing. And again, the same type of edit. We don't need an article about a voyeuristic picture as a reference in the first line of the lead. Meters (talk) 07:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Patna–Digha Ghat line. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 04:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Abecedare (talk) 16:10, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Athena Brensberger for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Athena Brensberger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athena Brensberger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Insaafbarua, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Moin Qureshi have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Widefox; talk 01:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Stop icon Please do not remove the ((copyviocore)) template from articles, as you did with Moin Qureshi. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:Moin Qureshi/Temp. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates may be blocked from editing. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moin_Qureshi&diff=865309486&oldid=865298573 Widefox; talk 13:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. creating BLPs failing WP:V, copyright vio inc close paraphrasing, edit warring (repeatedly recreating without addressing the previous), and disrupting valid redirects Widefox; talk 13:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Athena Brensberger[edit]

Notice

The article Athena Brensberger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP looks WP:TOOSOON and WP:NOTINHERITED from NASA Socials or YouTube personality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 13:50, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Insaafbarua. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive edits[edit]

Hi there, I don't consider these changes constructive. Indian film financial data is based on guesses and estimates. There is no singular authority for this sort of thing. So when sources differ in opinion about a film's gross, it would never be appropriate for an editor such as yourself to decide which value is "true". Editors' personal biases should not be introduced into articles. If there is a disparity, the content should perhaps be presented as a range. Since you have been reverted, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for how the information should be presented. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arfa Khanum Sherwani for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arfa Khanum Sherwani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arfa Khanum Sherwani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 08:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]