Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

• Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when a report has been closed at SPI, even though it hasn't yet been archived, it's generally better practice to create a new report when you want to add more socks. If you wish instead to note the new suspected socks in the closed report, then you should at least ping the clerk to let them know. Otherwise, it might not be noticed and archive with no action, especially on a long report like this one. Anyway, I reopened the report, mainly because it was easier than my creating a new report for you, and I'm lazy sometimes. This is just a tip for the future.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Thanks, It was the first time I took part in SPI, I did not noticed it was closed, get used to boxed closings.

Now I opened a new section, I hope I did it on the right way (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/I_am_Jewish_1998#20_July_2023). Could you help me where to ask to revert all the edits of one of them? Or is it better to do it one by one? (some are already reverted). Thanks, JSoos (talk) 07:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC) Rollback was done by admin JSoos (talk) 10:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]