An article you recently created, Alireza Jadidi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:
References need to be associated with text using in line citations.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((Db-g7))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Javan81!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 02:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
...and still no inline citations (resubmitted without any improvement).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Could you show example Page to solve problem where is not in line ? Javan81 (talk) 13:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All of your references are entered in the References section. To be done correctly, NONE of the references are entered in the References section. Instead, each reference is inserted in the article, after the facts that are being verified by the reference. The software automatically insterts a number there, and shows the ref under References. Look at any article; go to a section that has references, click on Edit. That will show on the screen where the refs were inserted. David notMD (talk) 14:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
is problem reference again ? I should write again reference ?
is correcte profile in line ? Javan81 (talk) 21:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have not yet shown an ability to add references properly, as in the text, not under "References", ans so the draft has been nominated for deletion (and the photo, at Commons, because it is not your own work). You have a week or so to verify text with references - in the text - or the draft will be deleted. David notMD (talk) 02:40, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
again write reference with URL please Help to me Javan81 (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote again but the line get down of Page I don’ know why please
help to me and give me time to solve my problem Javan81 (talk) 03:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I moved all the refs from References (wrong place) to the lead. This is still not really the right place. Each ref should be put immediately after the content it verifies. Refs can be used in more than one place. David notMD (talk) 08:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is not place of reference ?
I should to write all profile again ?
Is another place wrong ?
thank you very much for you helping I trying to fix all as soon Javan81 (talk) 08:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
thank you very much . but I am trying to put reference in parageraph but still any change any videos or example for do that ? Javan81 (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your draft will be deleted in 7-10 days if you do not improve referencing. Work on that. Images and video contribute nothing to confirming notability. David notMD (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your helping finally I wrote in-line Javan81 (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How can send again Review to Wikipedia ?
I sent wrong again yesterday I need to do with new edit
please help to me again Javan81 (talk) 11:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chess was:
I went ahead and copy-edited the draft so it looks better. Anyways, the inline citations have made significant progress since the last review. However, it isn't enough. To be specific, I'll just bullet-point some of the claims that needs a cite.
"Jadidi started playing professional volleyball in 2004 by playing for Sanam Tehran Sports Club, going on to play for Matin Varamin VC, Saipa Tehran, Damash Gilan, and Kalleh Mazandaran."
"In 2005, Jadidi was invited by Ivans Bugajenkovs to Iran under 19 volleyball national team." Given that the infobox says he started playing for the team in in 2004, how can this be true? Needs a cite anyways.
"In 2008, Jadidi won 1st place in the 2008 Asian Junior Men's Volleyball Championship in Tehran, Iran and was named the best blocker in Asia." This needs a cite for the best blocker claim and the claim he won the tourney.
"In 2012 Jadidi got 2nd place in 2012 Asian Men's Club Volleyball Championship[14] and he was named the best blocker among Asian Volleyball clubs." Again needs a cite for the claim he's the best blocker.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thanks for contributing to the article Draft:Alireza Jadidi. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru(talk) 21:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
Would have accepted it, but the information in the infobox needs sourcing. Height, birth date etc. Other than that, great work, and it should be accepted after this has been done!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alireza Jadidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.