Perhaps you'd enjoy working on organized labor.

You might also enjoy connecting with User:Fuzheado and his events. --Djembayz (talk) 20:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gail Gorlitzz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gail Gorlitzz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kadam92! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 19:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kadam92. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Gail Gorlitzz.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natasha Courtenay-Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kadam92, I thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, EIN Presswire, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EIN Presswire.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|ARandomName123)). And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 21:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ARandomName123: Okay, thanks for the alert. Would it be better to remove some of the 'important people'/leadership listed for the company since that relies on primary sources (I wasn't sure if I should just put the CEO and COO or others in leadership, but I think some of the leadership have probably written 2ndary source articles, etc. so I'll look) or just add more detail and secondary sources and reasons why it might be a relevant topic and organization?

Kadam92 (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The concern isn't the primary sources present, it's the lack of secondary coverage. To establish notability, you need to add multiple reliable, secondary sources that provide significant coverage of the article subject. Please see the links in this reply for further information. Thanks. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ARandomName123: Ah okay. I think I added 2 secondary sources in case it helps. Will poke around to see if there are other secondary sources that make sense. Thanks for your prompt reply.

Kadam92 (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ARandomName123:

Also, it is now linked within the article of "list of press release agencies"

Kadam92 (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kadam92. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Natasha Courtenay-Smith, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]