AfC notification: Draft:Yan Zi Dong has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yan Zi Dong. Thanks! EROS message 09:13, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yan Zi Dong has been accepted[edit]

Yan Zi Dong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EROS message 09:15, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Kyal Sin Sita, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Myint Hlaing have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are editing same thing again?[edit]

I had replaced your photo by a clear one on Jishnu Deb Burman.But again you have added the older one.Please don't repeat this again.I encourage you to edit other things.Hope you understand.Thankyou..! Binamra Deb (talk) 15:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Return of the Condor Heroes into The Romance of the Condor Heroes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted ((copied)) template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:51, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]