Hello Kyle154. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kyle154. The template ((Paid)) can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: ((paid|user=Kyle154|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName)). If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your detailed message, I really appreciate your efforts. I am not paid writer, please guide me that how can I improve this article. we already added the source full links and related information. and other source will linked soon such as Forbes news coverage and so on. Kyle154 (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You keep saying 'we'. Please explain the nature of the group that is editing from this account. MrOllie (talk) 16:53, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK , sorry for that , I already added the useful source links such as KR, Srivatsa. "Why Reliable And Authentic News Is Important In NFT And Metaverse World". Entrepreneur. Retrieved 2022-07-12 and I also would like to add more information and authorized twitter links too. Kyle154 (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , I got your point regarding twitter. Thanks alot for your prompt response. Kyle154 (talk) 17:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That entrepreneur piece is 'Promoted content' - it isn't an independent article, it is a paid advertisement. MrOllie (talk) 17:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is contributed by writer, and write the content in organic source. Kyle154 (talk) 17:12, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I trying to find more reliable source for this article. Thank you Kyle154 (talk) 17:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kyle154, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as ConsidererSy3d (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection, with this account. You can check by IP or other source. Kyle154 (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And yet out of Wikipedia's millions of pages, they choose to edit the page you have worked very hard on. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But my account is blocked, how can I share my contribution? Kyle154 (talk) 10:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PLease give me one chance, and I will try to improve my quality work.

Thank you Kyle154 (talk) 10:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, NFTStudio24, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 05:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much to move this article to draft, its good to submit this draft for review rather then publish directly. Kyle154 (talk) 05:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:NFTStudio24 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NFTStudio24, just deleted yesterday. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Respect your decision, but it is in draft and editing the independent source link. I am following the Wikipedia rule and try to create article according to policy, Draft article have 7 days to edit and submit for review, its right to create and submit to wiki administrator, Kindly give some space to create informative content, Kyle154 (talk) 06:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kyle154. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page NFTStudio24, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the ((request edit)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 07:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

– Athaenara ✉ 07:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your reply. I have been related to Web3 industry for last five years. And it is my duty to spare valid information to the world. I have not direct contact to the company or paid contributor.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyle154 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thank you so much for your reply. I have been related to Web3 industry for last five years. And it is my duty to spare valid information to the world. I have not direct contact to the company or paid contributor.

Decline reason:

This is almost incoherent. Why are you using the word, "duty", here? That indicates an obligation, a conflict of interest. Nor does this address that you've been violating WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am new here but, I am following the rules; you check my history, too; kindly unblock me.

Thank you Kyle154 (talk) 07:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Am I unblock? Kyle154 (talk) 10:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection with that person, please let me know how can I show proof of that. It's my personal account, and that's why I am concerned about my account.

Thank you for your time. Kyle154 (talk) 10:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kyle154 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is my personal account,I have no connection with any other account, i would like to contribute as a voluntary to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reasons for your block. Please see the advice we give to users about how to appeal an unblock. In particular, you will have to address the promotional editing you have done; I understand that you're asserting that you're not being paid for your edits to Wikipedia, but this (admin only link) reads like an ad, not like a neutral encyclopedia article, and that's a problem regardless of your conflict-of-interest status. Speaking of which, even beyond the spam editing, your edits call your claims about COI into question; you frequently use words like "we" and "our" to refer to your edits, implying that you represent a group in your editing, and in this edit (again, admin only), you refer to yourself as a "team member". Even if you're not being paid specifically to edit Wikipedia, if you are part of the organization/website/etc. you are writing about, you must disclose your connection to the subject you're writing about, per Wikipedia:Paid-contribution_disclosure (specifically note the section titled "Additional notes on who must disclose"). But even if you are completely unconnected with the subject of the article, and are just writing out of sheer enthusiasm, the promotional tone of your writing is a serious problem that must be addressed before you will be unblocked. Also, this didn't factor into your block itself, but I'll note that, while reviewing your contributions while researching this block, I did revert one of your edits as a copyright violation; you had directly copied text from the source. Don't do that. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 11:22, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For the third time, why were you using the word, "duty"? Your continued refusal to answer this question counts against any possibility of you being unblocked. Either you simply don't understand the English language sufficiently to communicate here, in which case WP:CIR applies and you must remain blocked, or you are hiding something, in which case you should remain blocked. Which is it? --Yamla (talk) 10:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I really apologize for hurry reply, the answer to your question is here; duty word doesn't mean that I am hired or paid contributor; duty means I have five years of experience in the web3 world, and there is still lots of things are not written in Wikipedia such as Ethereum Name Service (ENS) , Metaverse, Web3 coding, blockchain coding languages and so on.

I would try to contribute with Wikipedia in this section.

I hope this time I convey my message to you ,

Thank you so much for your precious time.

Regards

Kyle Kyle154 (talk) 10:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle154 (talk) 12:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are not eligible to use the retired template as you are blocked indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]