This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Hi Licks-rocks, if you want to line up your user boxes you can try putting ((Userboxtop)) on the line above them and ((Userboxbottom)) on the line beneath them - if that's what you're trying to do of course. Mikenorton (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Licks-rocks! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
To explain why I reverted you, some years ago the tabloid format was only applied to such as the Sun and the Mirror, and possibly the Daily Mail. This divide was fairly safe and "the tabloids" was a safe description of the "yellow press", Later, however, the "broadsheet" titles changed to the tabloid format to cut costs and make reading the paper easier. An unintended result of this is that the tabloid/broadsheet divide is no longer watertight. I hope this clarifies matters. Britmax (talk) 10:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Regarding this and this? Why are you placing your comment all the way down there when you are not replying to me? How do you figure that such a disjointed style is best? Also, I did not mention/reply to you, and your revert altered my post. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
You probably noticed I have offered a new option to the Rowlings debate. It is still as work in progress. I have never created a RfC or an alternative proposal on any Wikipedia Board before. I will notify everybody tomorrow or sunday, but if you have any recommendations I would be interested. I log out now as soon as it is possible for me to do. ~ BOD ~ TALK 23:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
I suggest paying attention when you try to drop a template on my talk page. Also, attempting to template an existing user is generally considered in poor form, so consider not doing it. --Licks-rocks (talk) 20:04, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._K._Rowling&diff=966005244&oldid=965995806
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._K._Rowling&diff=966015740&oldid=966013451
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._K._Rowling&diff=966021183&oldid=966020286
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._K._Rowling&diff=966021183&oldid=966020480
4NEDOCHAN (talk) 20:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. NEDOCHAN (talk) 20:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Really just dropping by to say hello and welcome. I appreciate how you handled the andalusite editor. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 16:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)