Hello Maria1718182! Your additions to Vittoria Ceretti have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Maria1718182! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 00:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Irina Shayk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Yamla (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 12:18, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Almost all of your edits are actively harmful to Wikipedia, not to mention your violations of WP:SOCK. You are very, very close to an indefinite block. Please stop editing, step back, and take the time to read and understand our policies. If you continue making harmful edits, I will block you indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Maria1718182! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 13:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugenia Volodina, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Russian and Agency. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the ((Ctopics/aware)) template. Hipal (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Maria1718182. Thank you for your work on May Tager. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|SunDawn))
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Maria1718182
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username SunDawn, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Lucy Markovic, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
((proposed deletion/dated...))
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|SunDawn))
. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Maria1718182,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sofia Steinberg for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Maria1718182. Thank you for your work on Sofia Steinberg. CurryTime7-24, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Article does not cite any reliable secondary sources that establish subject's notability per WP:BASIC. An online search turned up nothing. If these exist, please do include them.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|CurryTime7-24))
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
CurryTime7-24 (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Maria1718182, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sofia Steinberg, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia Steinberg.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|CurryTime7-24))
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia Steinberg (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from restoring your own edits, unless you can verify with mutiple and/or reliable sources that the information you've added is correct. As the people above me have stated already, take the time to read the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia: Verifiability and Wikipedia: Reliable sources. Thanks Közinde (talk) 21:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Maria1718182,
Thank you for creating Caroline Ribeiro.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
some links can be combined into one reference at the bottom
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with ((Re|Oaktree b))
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Oaktree b (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Please do edit articles to reflect your own point of view, or your own personal analysis, as you did to Gigi Hadid. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] [2] [3] --Hipal (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)