![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Was working on figuring that out and then you got it, #REDIRECT? is that how you did that?Ed42311 (talk) 03:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
for cleaning up my user page, and you are right. I did say (write) that you could. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:39, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE
Hey if you ever come across stuff like this please remove it per WP:ELNEVER. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 02:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I've protected your user page and user talk page for a couple of day due to the vandalism earlier. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I've been editing Orna Salinger's wiki page. I know her well and it is full of inaccuracies (i think it may have been put up as a joke). I am trying to remove the untrue information but this has been flagged up as "vandalism". It would be better to take the page down or allow my edits. Thank you!
p — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.85.212 (talk) 14:33, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi there! I noticed your edit to Dracunculus medinensis changing "Guinea worm" -> "guinea worm" which was later reverted. I was totally going to re-revert back to your version and wave around English grammar claiming that even though "Guinea" is a proper noun on its own, it is here an eponym which has fallen into common use as all lowercase (much like fallopian tube which is also named after someone). So I was totally with you. But then I realized that CDC and the Carter Center both go with "Guinea worm" (although WHO seems to have gone with "guinea-worm"). So maybe both are commonly-used... I guess not everyone will appreciate grammar like we do. Anyway, I just figured I should post this here so that when you notice the revert, it'll save you a few minutes of slightly-irate Googling (though now it's such a common word, perhaps "googling" is more appropriate). Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 23:36, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
I notice that you have been amending a number of my "year in Australian literature" pages by replacing the existing dashes with hyphens. Is there a specific reason for this? When I created the first pages in this series I was following the lead of the "year in literature" pages which also used dashes. Is this a style consideration or did I miss a discussion on the topic? I'm happy to get it right but would rather I figured it out now. Thanks for your help with this. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 01:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
the MOS expert
Thank you for taking care of the numerous and often confusing MOS guidelines, which many of us hopelessly try to memorise, across hundreds of Wikipedia articles ever since you began editing less than a year ago. Your countless minor edits, politeness, humility to accept your own mistakes speak for themselves. Yur spelng iz soo gud , and you are no more "insignificant"
, for you are an awesome Wikipedian!
Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
I'll refer to the MOS in the future now that I know about it!
Also, it turns out that the link to the relevant section was MOS:REFPUNCT, not WP:REFPUNCT (just in case we need to share that in the future)Myoglobin (talk) 00:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
As you are interesting in editing I thought this may interest you. Many articles have unnecessary repetition of the article name in section titles. I must have cleaned up a few hundred such articles myself but there is much more to do. It is generally fairly easy to check - just scan the contents lists of articles until you see a problem.--Penbat (talk) 19:57, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed you left a question on the history of Environmental racism in Europe.
Yes, the change I made was intentional. These secondary citations link to the original location of an embedded video which is found at the website of the original reference. Some of the citations reference the video specifically instead of the other site, as it was produced by different authors / journalists and I felt it was in good practice to reference them as distinctly as possible.
You are more than welcome to delete these secondary citations if you feel it is appropriate. If you think they are unnecessary, feel free to remove them. Once again, I really, really appreciate all of the editing work you have done to ensure that this article meets Wikipedia standards! It means a lot :)
(FYI, I am close to completing my main contributions to this article. I will be adding several more country profiles tonight, and am working to obtain permission for a number of photographs, which may take some time. This being stated, a significant amount of the material in this article is time-sensitive, and will benefit from ongoing updates and potentially further peer editing.)Sturgeontransformer (talk) 04:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Footnotes#Footnotes:_using_a_source_more_than_once — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sturgeontransformer (talk • contribs) 02:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Well, that's an interesting prospect! I'd be happy to assist with your future articles if you want. Feel free to drop me a message anytime.
As for naming refs, something you might have some experience with already: As the page says, to name a ref, you simply type "name=(whatever)" after "ref" (e.g., <ref>Foo</ref> → <ref name=Foo>Foo</ref>), and to use the name ("Foo"), you put down a forward slash after the name (i.e. <ref name=Foo/>), and if the name is more than one word, quotation marks are necessary (e.g. <ref name="Multiple words">Ref whose name has multiple words</ref>). (Demonstration: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,[1] consectetur adipiscing elit,[2] sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.[1][2]) I see you used reFill to assist naming refs, but the problem with that is that it only identifies and names perfectly identical references, which means those finicky page numbers have to be put in manually. You can keep the ref names as they are (or use something more descriptive), and use the template for reference pages to indicate page number. If you want, you can look at examples, like this diff. To use it, simply plop down double curly brackets, a vertical bar, the page numbers, and closing double curly brackets after the ref (i.e. ((rp|X)), which produces : X ). Hope this wasn't too confusing or repetitive for you. Me, Myself & I (☮) (talk) 03:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Well, rarely do I crack a smile at a Wikipedia editor, but you just made my day. Feel free to review my work as many of the mistakes that happen come from the bizarre autocorrect feature on our favorite site. My advice on edit summaries: never explain, never complain. No one cares. I'm not sure about this user name of yours....but to each his (or her) own. Oh, by the way, since you are an editor, can you tell me how to actually create a family tree--I feel like an idiot reading the W. instructions. Dr. Grampinator (talk) 16:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
I have no personal objection to [this change], but for future reference I think you're misunderstanding WP:WE, which specifically allows "we" when it refers to the modern world (or, as in the case of the article, the human race) as a whole. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 02:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
[Edit: clicked "leave message here," but it posted here, which is why this post is written like a personal email!] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sturgeontransformer (talk • contribs) 19:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi!
Just wanted to send you a friendly update on recent work and changes regarding my Wikipedia articles.
First off, photos! You may or may not have noticed that about ten days ago, I tagged several photos for speedy deletion shortly after uploading and posting them. (Well, except for one photo, which I missed and only tagged for deletion yesterday, lol). Long story short, it was a bit of a learning curve when it came to educating myself on the finer points of wikipedia standards for image copyright. I think I've finally got it all figured out, and we shouldn't be seeing too many more issues of this nature in future. This being said, if there are ever any questions, I always welcome it when people point out an error!
(OK, seriously, is the banner at the top of your user page that says "If I make any mistakes, feel free to break out the trout" your own, or can I use it too!?)
The Environmental racism in Europe article may still see a couple photos added. All of the photos in the article (except for one, which I'll mention in a moment!) are on solid copyright grounds. As it stands, I basically see this article as done, with the exception of ongoing updates and future additions to Wikiprojects. There is also a possibility that I might add a couple more photos. Right now, I'm just waiting for further notice of copyright permission from a couple people, and will likely know more in a few days.
(And it's been fun, actually--right now, I'm having a copyright permission request translated into Italian, and am getting up at 4AM to phone someone in Jokkmokk, Sweden, tomorrow, lol....) I'll send you a message if I actually get permission from anybody!
Now, I do have one question for you. I've had this one image posted under a Fair Use rationale, and it's remained up for two weeks, yet hasn't been fully reviewed by editors. So far, nobody has tagged it with "|image has rationale=yes"
It's kind of driving me crazy--I've given a very detailed rationale, but nobody has checked it over, so it's kind of in limbo, and it seems to me like, maybe nobody is paying attention to it? I'm starting to wonder if the Fair Use status will ever get confirmed. So basically, I was wondering if you might have any suggestions for getting it reviewed quicker? In any case, here's the image!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Essential_Oils_Distillery_Explosion,_Mitcham_March_30,_1933.jpg
Lastly, if you hadn't noticed already, I just thought I'd let you know that I finally did finish the ref tag cleanup for History of Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh Longshoremen, 1863-1963. Once I had it figured out, it was easier than I thought! From now on, any future articles I write will come with pre-tagged references :)
best, Sturgeontransformer (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Please update the dead link about the Nativism vs. empiricism paragraph in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perceptual_psychology.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thehalcyonsavant (talk • contribs) 14:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I was in the middle of a massive set of corrections to Jeremiah Fufeyin when you did your edits & got hit with the conflict note when I tried to save it. Several of our corrections were the same (like fixing the section headings) but I'd made a bunch of other fixes like correcting multiple errors in the ref links. There were too many differences for me to easily reconcile, so I replaced your changes. There might be a few I missed if you want to check back (the bolding bits, for instance, I didn't get to yet). Thanks for your help, the page creator's a newbie & he asked me for assistance but it's a massive bit to do. JamesG5 (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
In the pancolitis entry it stated it is IBD, and you say this is "Inflammatory bowel disorder", it is a disease, not a disorder, it is "inflammatory bowel diseases. I am a sufferer of IBD (ulcerative colitis), and disorder makes it sound similar to IBS, but it's much worse than a disorder or syndrome. Misinformation is a really producer of ignorance for the condition. Please correct,. Thank you. Nadene82 (talk) 00:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for your tremendous work here on Wikipedia! I've seen you making constructive edits on countless of articles I've watched. In fact so many that I'm wondering if you're using any software for it? For instance do you use some tool that shows you articles which have the article titles in multiple section headers (such as here)?
--Fixuture (talk) 11:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing—Sexism in the technology industry —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. TheDracologist (talk) 22:54, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
I've asked for a revert of your undiscussed move to remove the final s from Brooks's law. See the recent RM discussion there. And see Strunk & White and other guides about this. Dicklyon (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
SORRY, I PUT THIS IN THE WRONG PLACE! (unrelated message, please don't bite me) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frescadp (talk • contribs) 23:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC) Hi, Me, Myself and I... Fresca here. It looks like you'ree still actively doing good deeds here, which is lovely. We met last spring when I was a newbie, and I'm afraid I totally dropped off soon afterward. I have, however, just now finished(?) an entry I started in my sandbox back in [eek] March. This is *totally optional*, of course, but I wondered if before I hit the button to send it off to some anonymous Wikipedian, you would take a look at it to see if I've put it together correctly? (Actually, I'm not even sure that's possible. But I hope you might...) Please don't hesitate to tell me to just go ahead and send it off! I've even forgotten how to format these messages correctly. I think these tildes will do it. Frescadp (talk) 23:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi @Me, Myself, and I are Here. Thanks for improving the article. I am not a native English speaker, so will you please help me to improve the article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_of_the_Holy_Spirit_CDES They also have a fantastic choir band which can be listened online http://cdes.edu.uy/es/cdes-choir-band/ and its located in a UNESCO world heritage site http://cdes.edu.uy/es/unesco-world-heritage-40-imutes-away/ I knew the place when I visited the Country to promote my work, Free Rice for the Poor. The CDES its a well known institution nationalwide. Also its a Dot EDU domain provided by the Ministry of Education. Thanks in advance Taesulkim (talk) 19:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
I will research and let you know. Thanks in advance!!Taesulkim (talk) 22:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi again.. I find this Video at Carleton University and Professor Odin givin a Speach on Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcSCQ1fmJes on minute 9:04 he start his exposition and present himself. I will continue looking If I can bring more sources to support the article. If you find it suitable, plese include it in the page I created.! Taesulkim (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Although it is inside the College itself, all the studies and honours are linked to the certificate. I really don't know if it suitable, or if I must decline from the article I wrote. Thanks for the advice, or for the editing if you are willing to help. Taesulkim (talk) 02:06, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi again... I edited the article myself. Can you take a look? Thanks Taesulkim (talk) 05:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi again...
Can you please help me to improve the article??
I updated with reliable links, but it is schedulled to be earsed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/College_of_the_Holy_Spirit_CDES
Sorry to bother you.. Its quite discouraging getting the first article deleted, although I already edited over 100 articles. Taesulkim (talk) 21:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Greetings from Sturgeontransformer; long time, no see!
First off, I just wanted to inform you of some recent changes to an article I wrote. Un-cited edits were made to the article by another user, without adequate explanation or rationale given. In any case, I am prepared to follow proper protocols of third opinion and dispute resolution if need be. Since you are familiar with my work, I wanted to share the explanation I wrote on the talk page defending my original text.
Also, I wanted to provide an update on the Environmental racism in Europe page. Recently added a whole new set of photos to the article, which was quite the mini-project!
Last time we spoke, I had mentioned that I was getting up at 3 AM to phone someone in Sweden for permissions. We ended up having a great academic discussion, and it was an all-round wonderful exchange. Really cool person!
Best,Sturgeontransformer (talk) 09:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Glad to hear you think I did the revert properly, I appreciate your assurances! As for the visuals, I've really come to value the importance of having pictures. FYI, if you want to check out probably one of the longest Fair Use justifications you'll ever find of wikipedia, have a look at the Mitcham Common Distillery explosion photo I uploaded! Link below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Essential_Oils_Distillery_Explosion,_Mitcham_March_30,_1933.jpg
And my friend in Sweden! Yes, we called several times. Trying to call during business hours from Vancouver was awkward, especially before having to leave my work at 6:00 AM (I work at a tuna processing plant!) I kept missing the person (away from phone, meetings, etc.) and probably called 5-6 times before we were able to organize a better time to talk. So I had to wake up at crazy hours for quite a few times in a row! But it was totally worth the effort.
The person / my friend is a Sami activist from Jokkmokk. Once we finally had the chance to speak, we talked for nearly an hour about environmental and social issues related to mining in Arctic Sweden/Norway/Finland/Sapmi, among many other subjects of interest. We had a wonderful discussion about things we think could be done differently with Creative Commons, and talked about ethical considerations surrounding journalism and the depiction of politically charged historical events, such as the Kallak Controversy. Talked about how sometimes "boring" images without people (aka images of landscapes, machinery, and inanimate objects) can be just as interesting & valuable as photos of the actual conflict itself!
In any case, we decided to keep in touch, mostly by email, because we have so much more to share with each other. Once we got to know each other, we actually joked, with all meaningful intentions, that the image permission / wikipedia stuff was really just an excuse to make the connection and get in touch to share all these things. It was! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sturgeontransformer (talk • contribs) 09:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
I don’t think meatspace discussions will ever go out of fashion! People love to be acknowledged, and to acknowledge others. If anything, in our era of social media, I think many, many people appreciate respectful, thoughtful, direct communication all so much more.
There’s no point writing on Wikipedia to prove how much we know. Academic formalities are very important, but should not be barriers to expanding critical perception. I write on Wikipedia as a way of learning. I see this resource as an entry point to meaningful dialogue with others. It isn’t about where we are coming from, or what we never knew. It is about where we are going, how we are learning, questioning, and sharing. Life has simply thrown me some quirky coincidences of opportunity, and I see it fitting to share what I have learned, in the hope that it will give others inspiration to ask questions.
Yo[h]ck-mock!!!
I’m friends with someone from Umeå who confirmed how to pronounce it. Funnily enough, that friend also happens to be Sami, and was visiting Vancouver for the year. We met when I was at the Scandinavian community centre looking for someone to translate a letter into Swedish (also for someone in Jokkmokk...I know, it was a total coincidence—long story—it was art-related). Honestly, I’m not sure what it is about Vancouver, but I keep running into Sami people here, and I’m like, what is it about this town?
Here’s three people whose work you might find interesting!
http://elle-maija-tailfeathers.com/
https://worksthatwork.com/4/sami-self-sufficiency (Joar Nango was in Vancouver for a residency, and is an absolute riot! His partner, Tanya Busse, also an amazing artist, has this really cool project on the go, in collaboration with Emilija Skarnulyte: http://www.debrisfanzine.com/emilija-skarnulyte-and-tanya-busse/)
You are correct about the Kallak controversy article—that is the event I am referring to. I might try and expand on it if I have time in the foreseeable future. Too many articles that need to be expanded!
According to the person I was speaking with, the project is on hold and under legislative review—and nobody knows when the results of that review will come out. It could be next week, or it could be in five years. It is believed that the protests did influence the decision to grant a more in-depth review instead of a more streamlined approval process.
There are many factors behind the pending decision, which under Swedish law (much like in Canada) is supposed to balance the overall economic benefit of the mine, the social and cultural impacts on the Sami reindeer herders, and of course, the effects on the regional ecology and all the animals in it. A UNESCO Biosphere is nearby. The person I was speaking with told me something that I found really thought-provoking. He said “the reason why it is so difficult to counter these kinds of developments is because they are offering dreams. Whether it is good jobs, healthcare, education for your children, having a nice home, these are dreams that everyone wants. But then you ask other people in the [Sami & hunting/fishing/foraging-dependent northern communities], and there’s the other side of the story, the impacts, the other point of view.”
You might wonder how I ever found out about Kallak / Gallók in the first place—it was actually from listening to music on YouTube. I know...basically, I listen to a lot of heavy metal music, and a lot of it is from Scandinavia, and well, the YouTube search also brought up some folk / electronica / bluegrass musicians who I thought were really awesome, namely Sofia Jannok (her most recent album, “Orda” blew me away!) and Maxida Märak. Their songs talk about these issues a lot, which helped bring my awareness right around the same time that I was starting to learn about environmental concerns facing Romani communities. And so that’s how I began to think about these two issues in relation to each other, in large part because of music. I merely stumbled upon these stories.
Lastly, in case you were wondering about what I actually do for a living. As mentioned earlier, I am employed at a fish processing plant for several months, which has been good. In the summer, I worked as a junk & scrap metal collection worker because it is a traditional Roma occupation, and I wanted to get a sense, just a little, about the garbage & recycling industry. Before that, I was in university studying visual art at ECUAD until I graduated last spring. I got into writing for Wikipedia as a result of a school assignment where we were tasked with sharing new material to the encyclopedia.
I just turned 24. After deciding I’m not ready to pursue a career in the art world—not yet, at least—I decided it was time to start looking for other work that interests me. This coming spring, I am planning to train at the BC Institute of Technology for several months in how to become a freight railroad worker, so that I can work for CN, CP, BNSF, etc. Being in Vancouver—aka “Terminal City,” where the trains horns blare 24/7 nonstop, it’s hard not to be interested in these monster machines. (Port Metro Vancouver is now the 3rd busiest and most diversified port in North America; a satellite port in Prince Rupert is also rapidly growing.) A lot of my art has been about this.
Anyways, that’s a little bit about who I am, and how I came to be interested in these subjects.
Keep asking questions! Your contributions to Wikipedia, regardless of how technical, academic, utilitarian, or expansive, are all important. These are the spaces that open consciousness and generative communication, and we should never limit ourselves to any perceived limits of knowledge.
Cheers!Sturgeontransformer (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Me, Myself, and I are Here. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
That was very handsome of you. - Scarpy (talk) 22:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi there. Thanks for pointing out WP's rules about subheadings. I agree that the simple "Origins" is better, but I'm unsure of modifying "Author editing and authors' writing skills". Other subheadings could be "When authors hire an authors' editor" or "Which authors benefit from an authors' editor", but I do not think these are very nice. Or perhaps "Impact of authors' writing skills on need for an authors' editor". But this is long. The short version you propose doesn't seem to describe the section at all. Can we leave it as is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valmataro (talk • contribs) 18:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello
I wanted to thank for adding more into theory of love. Im not sure if you are in my sociology class but thank you, The other thing is that because of all your adding I'm not going to be able to do my final project because everything i wrote is differently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorry92 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
Few people would stop by a new account to leave a kind and helpful message as you did here. It went without a response, until now. Even while the intended recipient might have ignored it, it is open, in public, as yet another evidence of the kind people of Wikipedia. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 07:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC) |
I t — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.255.134.46 (talk) 07:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for the comment about pseudogenes, but I confess that I have no good understanding of wikivoice (I ain't no Englesh majur). I searched help and there was nothing. Could you please direct me to more details about wikivoice? Thanks, Dennis Drdfp (talk) 08:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! I am closer to understanding footnotes. Drdfp (talk) 18:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Explain me WHY did you revert my edit because I don't get it. Blanca Lap (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
I already did that! I mean, please!! (And the mosuo project is a reliable organization)(and the second link is not in the article) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blanca Lap (talk • contribs) 21:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to this page. The eicosanoid page, at the bottom ~1/3, has a lengthy section on omega-3 versus omega-6 fatty acids and their metabolites. While sound, I think this section is off the topic of eicosanoids and is covered elsewhere in Wikipedia. I hesitate to delete it from eicosanoids while moving some of it to a more appropriate page. The section represents a lot of work. Your opinion and advice would be appreciated. joflaher
There is no mention of the fact that Julian Knight was abused while at ADFA. That fact has never been exposed. So, what was going through Julian Knight's mind after repeatedly being abused at ADFA. What was the answers to his alleged reporting to his superior officers that this was ocurrring. What drove Julian Knight to finally crack and do the most terrible acts on innocent people. This may be as a result of being stone-walled by his superiors and higher. Did the Defence Department cover up his abuse? Who were his abusers and more importantly, where are they working today? Were they promoted and are currently serving in the Australian Army today? Lots of unanswered questions that have been suppressed. Why is Julian Knight not allowed to discusss his abuse at ADFA? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.129.97.3 (talk) 06:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
You have helped me a lot. Thanks:-) 85.193.237.204 (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
This isn't about three reverts. The cycle is edit/revert/discuss. Reverting because you assume that you are right should not be an option. I happen to think that a dash without enclosing spaces looks utterly wrong, and there are no clear guidelines in MOS. As I attempted to say, use the talk page. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 02:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)