Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!-Andrew c [talk] 16:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Rough Collie appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 15:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Creationism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. HrafnTalkStalk 09:39, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Mike0001. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Collectonian (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I know you're engaged in a dispute with Collectonian, but editing other users' personal pages as you did with regards to the above edit is not a constructive method of discussion. Please try to remain civil. If you'd like a suggestion on moving forward in dealing with the dispute, I'd highly recommend seeking out a third opinion or starting an article request for comment to gauge further consensus on the points of contention. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, Mike. I'm going to try and sort out the dispute on the Rough Collie page; if you could go to the talk page of the article and provide a brief summary of what you feel should be in the article and why, I'd appreciate it.
I'd also highly recommend that you stop making edits accusing Collectonian of vandalism and ownership of articles, such as those that have generated the above warnings. I know you're frustrated, but taking it out in those manners is counterproductive. Take a deep breath and try to remain civil when dealing with this kind of thing. I'll be asking Collectonian to take a step back as well. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 16:43, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
This is not a reliable source for historical details: http://www.crystalinks.com/ Hardyplants (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
FYI I can't edit properly at the moment, so won't be able to answer your query until later in the day. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
Personally, I would suggest you revert yourself as a show of good faith, and start discussion on the talk page before you edit war. AniMate 00:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
If you continue to edit in a manner that ignores consensus and is disruptive, you are going to be blocked. Addhoc (talk) 16:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
You do not need to edit a template in order to add it to a page. Each template contains instructions on how to add them to pages, usually by putting ((template_name)) in it somewhere. Please stop editing templates and adding duplicate content to them. --GoodDamon 19:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
((unblock|Why was an IP address blocked that wasn't mine?))
((unblock|your reason here))
Hi, Please stop adding the ((fiction)) template to articles on religious subjects. You are clearly an atheist, but religious adherents do not regard tenets of their religions as fiction. So they should not be so categorized. Also, placement of such a cleanup template is usually accompanied by some discussion on the talkpage of the article, to discourage "drive-by tagging". Cheers, Silly rabbit (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Si dificile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Si dificile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 16:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)