Archives

January 2012 – December 2012 January 2013 – December 2013 January 2014 – December 2014 January 2015 – December 2015 January 2016 – December 2016 January 2017 – December 2017

in Power to the People (Italy) there are the Communist Refoundation Party, the Italian Communist Party, the Other Europe Tspiras, NoTAV, NoTAP, NoMUOS and hundreds of other associations and movements ... if all this is for you as a "new force" ... I can only take note of your ideological cancellations!--Delehaye (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)--Delehaye (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Delehaye: Of course FN is a group of stupid and violent neo-fascists (in my humble opinion), but I compared PaP to CPI and FN because it isn't listed in any opinion poll. Moreover we shouldn't insert in the infobox parties (or coalitions) that hadn't any deputies or senators (like PaP, CPI and FN). I didn't say that PaP is similar to New Force, but simply that putting it in the infobox wouldn't be correct... -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

then you should enter ONLY the data and photographs concerning the major coalition parties (1 by coalition, ie the one that will express the leader of the coalition) and the major parties that will run alone ... and NOT even the internal parties to the various coalitions ...--Delehaye (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)--Delehaye (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Delehaye: Ho visto che sei italiano quindi parlerò in italiano per farmi capire meglio. E' ovvio che PaP sia totalmente differente da Forza Nuova, ma ho preso come esempio due partiti come CasaPound e FN per evidenziare il fatto che pur essendo partiti, soprattutto il primo, con un certo seguito (ahimè), non li mettiamo nell'infobox perché non hanno nessun parlamentare eletto in questa Legislatura (proprio come PaP). Se il 4 marzo 2018, PaP (o CasaPound o qualsiasi altro partito) riuscirà ad eleggere qualche deputato allora si può pensare di metterlo, ma ad oggi io direi proprio di no (non abbiamo neppure Fratelli d'Italia, che farà sicuramente un risultato più alto della lista della Lorenzin, che invece è presente, per ora, nell'infobox). Per quanto riguarda le coalizioni, hai perfettamente ragione, ma come ho scritto in una discussione nella pagina delle elezioni, c'è un problema con il Centro-destra, in cui non si sa se mettere la foto di Salvini oppure quella di Silvio (io opterei per il secondo ma non siamo tutti d'accordo) -- Nick.mon (talk) 18:12, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, ti scrivo in italiano per comodità. Alle prossime politiche 2018 non ci sarà la "Lega Nord per l'indipendenza della Padania" ma la "Lega Salvini Premier", con obiettivi statutari diversi. Questa lista dovrebbe avere una voce autonoma? In fin dei conti si tratta di due cose diverse... --Sciking (talk) 16:34, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciking: Ciao! È esattamente quel che stavamo discutendo qualche giorno fa con un altro utente; dato il radicale cambiamento di logo e di nome, sarebbe opportuno creare un articolo a parte, magari trattandolo come una semplice lista elettorale formata dalla Lega Nord e da Noi con Salvini (più forse il Movimento Nazionale per la Sovranità ma ancora non è per nulla ufficiale). In ogni caso, sì io sarei per creare una nuova voce come tu stesso hai proposto :) -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anche a livello amministrativo è una lista, ne stiamo parlando anche su it.wiki. --Sciking (talk) 17:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciking: Penso proprio che a breve creeremo una voce specifica riguardo alla nuova Lega anche qui; nei prossimi giorni inizierò una discussione magari sulla pagina della Lega Nord, per decidere cosa fare, e ovviamente il tuo contributo è più che benvenuto. -- Nick.mon (talk) 18:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Garagepunk66. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Lazio regional election, 2018, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Garagepunk66 (talk) 22:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian general election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Italian general election, 2013, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please do not blank sections. Qwerty6811 (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Qwerty6811: Yes you're right, but we discussed about it in the talk page regarding the Italian general election, 2018. -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

((replyto|Nick.mon} Point taken. Qwerty6811 (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Article 1 – Democratic and Progressive Movement/meta/shortname has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gregg Popovich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Civica Popolare.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fratelli d'Italia Meloni.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Più Europa con Emma Bonino.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Forza Italia Berlusconi 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian general election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alemanno ha detto che ufficialmente che il MNS farà parte della coalizione Lega Salvini Premier, dunque c'è più senso nel fare la voce divisa... --Sciking (talk) 13:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciking: Sì certo, si può aprire una discussione sulla pagina della Lega Nord, anche se non so se la proposta verrà accettata da tutti, poiché come aveva già sottolineato un altro utente, anche altri partiti inseriscono nelle proprie liste membri di partiti minori senza che venga creato nessun nuovo articolo. Comunque ne possiamo discutere -- Nick.mon (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ma cambiano anche nome? Ad esempio FI avrà nell'uninominale alcuni candidati di EPI ma non si presenta come "FI-EPI" mentre la Lega cambia progetto, statuto e simbolo. --Sciking (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciking: Sì concordo, non è la stessa cosa rispetto a Forza Italia, che si presenterà sotto il nome (credo) "Forza Italia – Berlusconi Presidente" e avrà dentro alcuni membri di EpI, Rivoluzione Cristiana, Movimento Animalista ecc. Comunque possiamo sicuramente discuterne nella talk page, poi vediamo cosa ne pensano anche gli altri utenti. -- Nick.mon (talk) 13:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luigi Di Maio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agostino Depretis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stradella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, ti segnalo che per il Ministero degli Interni la Lega Salvini Premier ha il medesimo statuto della Lega Nord per l'indipendenza della Padania. Trattasi di errore (e la cosa sarebbe grave) o effettivamente la Lega Nord ha presentato solo un simbolo diverso senza cambiare Statuto? --Sciking (talk) 22:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciking: Ciao, da quel che mi diceva un può di tempo fa l'utente Checco, il quale solitamente è abbastanza esperto sulle faccende interne alla Lega, la Lega avrebbe solamente presentato un nuovo simbolo per le elezioni, senza cambiare il suo statuto -- Nick.mon (talk) 08:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, nobody decided anything about redundancy, without sourced discussion. Two parties from same country have nothing more in common than any other world party, and on English Wikipedia, anthem sound is used in fairly tens of articles. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ThecentreCZ: Well, Checco reverted your edits, Mélencron did the same, I'm not the only one who thinks that the audio file is quite redundant and useless. -- Nick.mon (talk) 17:51, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick.mon: I did reverted the edit of other two users, which was reverted. Tell me, how imporatant is for example name of every newspaper of exact political party? It is not but it have information values. Users, whose started amending party anthems and even added this data in the infobox, thought differently very long time ago. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 18:08, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ThecentreCZ: Can we discuss about that on the appropriate talk page? However, I'm not against the anthem, I'm "against" the file, which enlarges inordinately the infobox. -- Nick.mon (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain. Why do you think that the 2018 Italian General Election not take place? No, this is not a silly question. You are accusing me of "vandalism." How is it vandalism? The election happened and the Italian Democratic Party got 17% of the vote. There is a fight among all the parties over who's going to get power, and it's chaos. The prime minister's predecessor, Matteo Renzi, who just resigned, has decided to come back and chastise some members for negotiating with the Five Star Movement. The League is feuding with the Neo-Burlosconi party and nobody has a clue how it's going to turn out. It's nearly as bad as when the Christian Democrats had a revolving door ministry (prime minister of the week) back before Burlosconi took over the first time. How is that NOT chaos? Jeez! If you want to help, GREAT! But don't just blank the page and say....oh, this is vandalism. It's NOT!!!! Arglebargle79 (talk) 21:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Arglebargle79: Saying "the new electoral law designed to prevent the Five Star Movement from taking power" is vandalism, simply because it's your own opinion, without any source to prove it; and writing about "chaos" and "collapse", well maybe it's true but isn't absolutely encyclopedic. -- Nick.mon (talk) 21:51, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you asked me to add a few references or looked them up yourself, that would be fine. but you didn't. BTW, if you go here you will notice that it is no opinion. Arglebargle79 (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Arglebargle79: The law penalizes the M5S because it legitimately refuse to create pre-electoral coalitions, as it penalize all the other parties which run alone. -- Nick.mon (talk) 21:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but M5S was the only one getting over two percent of the vote, so in fact, it targeted them and them alone while pretending not to. It's not my opinion, it's a fact. BTW, I added referencesArglebargle79 (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lega Nord Salvini.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlo Calenda, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Multinational and Relocation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carlo Calenda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giorgia Meloni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MEP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're at 3rr and no one has warned the IP or I would have blocked it. So please, don't revert again. If the IP reverts, report them or if I'm around I'll block. Ok?Doug Weller talk 06:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Ok, thank you, if the IP reverts again, I'll tell you immediately. -- Nick.mon (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check to see if I'm currently editing. I'm on holiday and might be out on a walk.Doug Weller talk 07:43, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug Weller, excuse me but the IP has reverted me again... -- Nick.mon (talk) 06:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As the IP seems to genuinely believe they are right, I've semi-protected the page for a week and explained on the IP's talk page that they need to get consensus and to do that they'll need sources backing them. Doug Weller talk 07:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, have a good holiday! -- Nick.mon (talk) 07:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Partito Liberale Italiano logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:51, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Presidents of Emilia-Romagna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luciano Guerzoni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paolo Gentiloni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Nick, cosa ne pensi di questa fonte?

Political atlas of the Modern World Year 2011 By Andre Melville, Yuri Polunin , Mikhail Ilyin and Others. in this Book talks about comparison between a cluster analysis of eight major powers" exertin maximun influence on the International Arena ( China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, UK and the US). [1] LuigiPortaro29 (talk) 19:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@LuigiPortaro29: Ciao! Secondo me va benissimo, sperando possa andar bene anche agli altri. Anche se da quel che ricordo per ora siamo 3 utenti a favore e 2 contro, quindi dovrebbe esserci la maggioranza per cambiare la versione attuale. -- Nick.mon (talk) 19:17, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Massimo Zanetti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sponsor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

RexxS (talk) 22:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Template:Z33[reply]

Hi. I've noticed you hardly ever use edit summaries. They are very helpful to other people, so please start using them. Especially in cases like this, where you uncollapsed the infobox despite the hidden comment "PLEASE DO NOT UNCOLLAPSE THE INFOBOX WITHOUT SEEKING A CONSENSUS FIRST ON THE ARTICLE'S TALK PAGE", you really need to give reasons for your actions. Thank you. Bishonen | talk 10:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: Sorry, you’re right, however I uncollapsed the infobox because it was the only collapsed one I’ve ever seen in 6 years on Wikipedia and I thought that it was quite useless. -- Nick.mon (talk) 12:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]