You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/NotThatJamesBrown for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Randomized (talk) 20:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
I haven't made any excuses, and nor do I need to. Your behaviour towards me has only been threatening and bombastic, and resulted in disruption of the electrical sensitivity article and talk page. I was referring, however, to you specific threat above of a "checkuser" after I had already answered you and asked you not to comment here again. This matter is closed, please drop it and lets move on to improving wikipedia - that's why I joined... ==(NotThatJamesBrown (talk) 13:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC))==
-yawn-. If you've got nothing to worry about then you won't mind the checkuser being performed then will you. Randomized (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Randomized (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
NotThatJamesBrown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Following advice on the block page I emailed the blocking admin. He asked me to post a request here using this template. From my email: I'd like to stress that I have no other accounts, and I use anonymiser services due to the nature of my work and travel. I have also been very busy recently so I haven't checked in on wikipedia for quite some time. I'd like to sort this out, so if you can tell me what you need to know I'd be happy to oblige. If you perform a checkuser you will see I have logged in from my home IP to write this, however I don't want my IP to be in the public domain. Best wishes, James Brown
Decline reason:
Evidence from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Unprovoked is pretty damning. Compound that with the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/NotThatJamesBrown and the fact that you are, for the most part, using Tor nodes, and the result is that this unblock request is denied. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 19:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have re-evaluated my block. Based on the evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Unprovoked, which produced a Likely result, I think this block should remain in effect. Jehochman Talk 18:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)