This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Archive 2: January 2014
Hi there. I deleted the article as it was a biographical article with no references at all. The complete text of the article was
If you have independant references etc for him - I think an article would be a great idea. best regards. Peripitus (Talk) 23:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Am trying to write articles with as much credible accreditation as possible. I know Charlie and Joe, and think I can put something together which will meet muster. When I do, I'll let you know, so you can take a look. Thanks for responding.
Onel5969 (talk) 00:17, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlie Kadau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Kadau (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for this. I've added my comments to the discussion.
Onel5969 (talk) 15:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
An IP made an edit on your User page this morning. I have reverted it and issued a warningon the IP's Talk. Probably watching Recent changes and could not resist my message to YOU in the edit summary(!)
Your User page is a place where no unregistered user may make revisions or additions and will always be reverted. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 10:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Big thanks for the edit... Wow.. please feel free to update any of my other articles.... cheers, steve — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiwisheriff (talk • contribs) 08:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Just so that you know to what I am referring.
Click on my name in the blue box! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 14:01, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
You are doing so well.
I am in awe of your citation skills.
I guess it is a quarter past nine over there — have a great Sunday!
Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 14:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
The Famous Flames is much improved. Thanks! InnocuousPseudonym (talk) 05:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)